Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Govspeak Summary is deprecated #598

Closed
alextea opened this issue May 16, 2017 · 4 comments · Fixed by #2447
Closed

Govspeak Summary is deprecated #598

alextea opened this issue May 16, 2017 · 4 comments · Fixed by #2447
Assignees

Comments

@alextea
Copy link
Contributor

alextea commented May 16, 2017

The govspeak content guidance says the summary formatting has been deprecated.

The related styles should be removed.

There's also an issue to remove the code that creates the markup in the govspeak repo.

@alextea
Copy link
Contributor Author

alextea commented May 16, 2017

An example of how it currently renders (first paragraph): https://www.gov.uk/separation-divorce

@tijmenb tijmenb transferred this issue from alphagov/static Nov 1, 2018
@owenatgov
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like this has been removed from govspeak and the work is to remove this from the gem. However it'd be useful to crawl the content store and see if the actually summary classes exist anywhere. Besides this, work should be quite simple.

@owenatgov
Copy link
Contributor

From @alex-ju on my above comment:

Thanks for looking into these, Owen – now that we know where they’re being used it will make it easier to remove them – agree with you on the govspeak summary, I would move ahead as well

I will therefore go ahead with removing this styling from this repo.

A next step after this is to run something to remove these from the content where they are being used and republish, however that can be handled in alphagov/govspeak#109

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants