fix: docs build #761
fix: docs build #761
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the documentation and configuration files of the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Documentation
participant Sphinx
User->>Documentation: Request documentation
Documentation->>Sphinx: Generate documentation with sphinx_rtd_theme
Sphinx-->>Documentation: Return styled documentation
Documentation-->>User: Display documentation
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
| @@ -51,7 +52,7 @@ flake8-isort = "^6.0.0" | |||
| flake8-annotations = "2.7.0" | |||
| flake8-absolute-import = "^1.0" | |||
| darglint = "^1.5.8" | |||
| sphinx-rtd-theme = "^2.0.0" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why is this still being included if it's being removed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
poetry.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- docs/conf.py (1 hunks)
- docs/source/snippets.rst (1 hunks)
- pyproject.toml (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
docs/source/snippets.rst (1)
17-17: Verify the new snippet reference and its implications.The change from
reliable_transaction_submission.pytosubmit_payment.pyraises some concerns:
- The section title suggests both transaction submission AND validation checking, but the new filename implies it might only cover payment submission
- The old filename seemed more aligned with the section's purpose
Let's verify the changes:
Please ensure that:
- The new snippet still demonstrates transaction validation checking
- All documentation referring to transaction submission and validation is updated consistently
- The content matches the section's purpose of showing both submission and validation
✅ Verification successful
The new snippet file is appropriate for the section's purpose
The
submit_payment.pyfile fully demonstrates both transaction submission and validation checking:
- Uses
submit_and_waitwhich waits for validation response- Explicitly checks the
validatedfield of the transaction- Shows the complete flow from submission to validation confirmation
- Includes balance verification before and after the transaction
The filename change is acceptable as it provides a more specific, practical example while still covering all the required functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new snippet file and its references # Test 1: Check if the new snippet file exists echo "Checking for new snippet file..." fd "submit_payment.py" snippets/ # Test 2: Check if the old file is still referenced elsewhere echo "Checking for references to old snippet..." rg "reliable_transaction_submission.py" # Test 3: Check content of new file if it exists echo "Checking new file content for validation logic..." rg -A 10 "wait_for_validated|validation" snippets/submit_payment.pyLength of output: 887
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the actual content of the new file to verify if it demonstrates both submission and validation echo "Content of submit_payment.py:" cat snippets/submit_payment.py # Also check if there are any other files referencing this example echo -e "\nChecking for other references to this example:" rg -i "send.*transaction.*validat" docs/Length of output: 1985
docs/conf.py (1)
32-32: Verify sphinx_rtd_theme configuration.The extension list update looks good. Let's verify the theme configuration is complete.
✅ Verification successful
Theme configuration is properly set up
The sphinx_rtd_theme is correctly configured:
- Extension is properly added in the extensions list
- Theme dependency is specified in pyproject.toml:
sphinx-rtd-theme = "^3.0.0"- Theme is correctly set with
html_theme = "sphinx_rtd_theme"- No legacy theme path configurations are present
- Previous default theme (alabaster) is properly commented out
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify sphinx_rtd_theme configuration and dependencies # Test 1: Check if sphinx_rtd_theme is properly specified in dependencies echo "Checking sphinx_rtd_theme dependency..." rg "sphinx-rtd-theme" pyproject.toml # Test 2: Verify no legacy theme path configurations remain echo "Checking for legacy theme path configurations..." rg "html_theme_path" docs/Length of output: 287
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's verify the complete theme configuration in conf.py echo "Checking theme configuration in conf.py..." rg "html_theme\s*=" docs/conf.py # Also check for any other theme-related settings echo "Checking other theme-related settings..." rg "^html_theme_" docs/conf.pyLength of output: 312
pyproject.toml (3)
19-19: LGTM! Formatting changes look goodThe reformatting of keywords, include, and packages sections maintains readability while being more concise.
Also applies to: 22-23
47-47: Verify compatibility with sphinx-rtd-theme v3.0.0The major version bump from v2 to v3 could introduce breaking changes. Please ensure the documentation builds successfully with this version.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for sphinx-rtd-theme related configuration rg -A 5 "sphinx_rtd_theme" docs/The previous discussion in the PR confirms this is an intentional change aligned with the documentation requirements.
78-79: LGTM! Task configuration formatting improves readabilityThe multi-line format for the test coverage sequence and consistent formatting for the test command configuration enhance maintainability.
Also applies to: 82-85
High Level Overview of Change
Context of Change
Type of Change
Did you update CHANGELOG.md?
Test Plan
Summary by CodeRabbit
sphinx-rtd-themedependency.