Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rerun clang tidy on fix merge #1124

Merged

Conversation

godexsoft
Copy link
Collaborator

Meh

@godexsoft godexsoft requested a review from kuznetsss January 16, 2024 17:00
@godexsoft godexsoft added bug Something isn't working ci CI related issues labels Jan 16, 2024
kuznetsss
kuznetsss previously approved these changes Jan 16, 2024
@godexsoft godexsoft dismissed kuznetsss’s stale review January 16, 2024 17:01

The merge-base changed after approval.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (1fa0900) 59.68% compared to head (4ce0c45) 59.68%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1124   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    59.68%   59.68%           
========================================
  Files          207      207           
  Lines        10478    10478           
  Branches      5584     5584           
========================================
  Hits          6254     6254           
  Misses        2637     2637           
  Partials      1587     1587           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@godexsoft godexsoft changed the title Bugfix/rerun clang tidy on fix merge7 Rerun clang tidy on fix merge Jan 16, 2024
@godexsoft godexsoft merged commit 12bbed1 into XRPLF:develop Jan 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working ci CI related issues
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants