-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Overhaul PDF Model code #57
Open
GravisZro
wants to merge
7
commits into
Robotips:master
Choose a base branch
from
GravisZro:pdf-overhaul
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Included files that are relative to the current directory should be included as such: \#include "relative_path/file.h" Included files that are relative to an included path should be included as such: \#include <some_path/file.h> The fact that they worked is somewhat of a bug and they may not always be the case.
Many variables were not initialized or were initialized only after complex code execution. Variables (especially pointers!!!) should ALWAYS be initialized at the start of the constructor in order to avoid uninitialized values while debugging code in the constructor. Always assign deleted pointers to nullptr for extra safety. I know it's against your style but I very much hope you adopt this style because it will save you from finding yourself in "impossible" situations.
The program has been using objects in freed memory for a very long time.
f935453
to
caeeb59
Compare
Safety/Initialization/Deletion fixes.
Fix include statements
Serious memory bug fix.
caeeb59
to
d8a45b8
Compare
I used re-structured the code to be more OO compliant. However, the main extraction loop was heavily modified to be readable. Some unused files were deleted and removed from the project file. Project file options were unified and updated for Appveyor.
d8a45b8
to
94eda0e
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I used re-structured the code to be more OO compliant. However, the main extraction loop was heavily modified to be readable. Some unused files were deleted and removed from the project file. This is a much cleaner implementation, so please merge it.
I did this because I was curious about how the actual extraction process worked. I now have some ideas for identifying labeled packages but this had to be cleaned up first.
Note 1: this PR is going to have conflicts with PR #54, so merge that first and I'll rebase this and resolve conflicts.
Note 2: the project files were modified to fix the Appveyor build issue with including poppler-qt headers