1077 refactor support esm deprecate commonjs syntax

[JoshuaSBrown]

Summary by Sourcery

Enhancements:

• Refactor the codebase to use ECMAScript modules (ESM) instead of CommonJS syntax.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR refactors the codebase to use ES Modules (ESM) syntax instead of CommonJS require statements. The changes primarily involve updating import statements while maintaining the same functionality.

Class diagram for module imports refactor

Loading

classDiagram
    class WebModule {
        - web_version: Version
        - express: Express
        - session: Session
        - sanitizeHtml: SanitizeHtml
        - cookieParser: CookieParser
        - http: Http
        - https: Https
        - crypto: Crypto
        - helmet: Helmet
        - fs: Fs
        - ini: Ini
        - protobuf: Protobuf
        - zmq: Zmq
        - ECT: ECT
        - ClientOAuth2: ClientOAuth2
        - uuidv4: UUIDv4
    }
    note for WebModule "This class represents the refactored module imports using ESM syntax."

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Replace CommonJS require() statements with ES Modules import syntax	Convert all require() statements to import statements Move variable declarations after imports Update package dependencies to support ESM Maintain existing functionality while modernizing syntax	web/datafed-ws.js web/package.json.in web/test/util.test.js

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @JoshuaSBrown - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• There are syntax errors in two import statements - remove the stray parentheses after 'ect' and 'client-oauth2'

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}