-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[1pt] PR: Renaming of benchmark data and associated variables #290
Conversation
….py" This reverts commit 591fdef.
That warning often happens when a math operation is not possible, perhaps because one of the contingency categories had a zero pixel count. It has been happening for a while and should be unrelated to these changes. |
The ble outputs appear to be in place and the visually look appropriate. I verified that the huc wide CSI are consistent from pr-rename-pr-ble vs fim_3_0_4_4_ms_c for both 100 and 500yr. The nws outputs appear to be in place and visually look appropriate. I verifed that for major category BRTT2 has consistent CSI from dev-rename-pr-nws. |
The benchmark inundation rasters were named "depth" instead of "extent", and NWS and USGS domain shapefiles were named "extent" instead of "domain". This branch addresses those issues in the
test_cases
directory and inrun_test_case.py
as well asrun_test_case_calibration.py
, although the latter will likely be deprecated.Testing
To test, you can run:
and then run:
And confirm no Traceback errors and good-looking outputs.