-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Configuration for the low res marine B #66
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've mostly reviewed the changes to the ensemble covariances, and looked through the other changes as well; see comments/questions below.
🎉
model/marine/marine_background_error_hybrid_diffusion_diffusion.yaml.j2
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not familiar with this, but looks ok
As the title says. ## Dependencies - NOAA-EMC/jcb-gdas#66 - NOAA-EMC/global-workflow#3238 - Update of the static files in glopara: NOAA-EMC/global-workflow#3239 ## Work done in this PR Interp to low-resolution: - [ ] variance partitioning - [ ] preparation of the perturbations for the envar - [ ] hybrid weights - [ ] ... ## Testing Visual check showing the variance explained by the steric height (30 members)  left is native resolution, right is on the 1/2 deg grid. **"Science" note:** The explained variance above is almost the opposite to what I would have expected, and what we saw in the previous offline ensemble, or even what we see in tendencies. Check if there's a bug in the explained variance calculation. # Automated CI tests to run in Global Workflow <!-- Which Global Workflow CI tests are required to adequately test this PR? --> - [ ] atm_jjob <!-- JEDI atm single cycle DA !--> - [ ] C96C48_ufs_hybatmDA <!-- JEDI atm cycled DA !--> - [ ] C96C48_hybatmaerosnowDA <!-- JEDI aero/snow cycled DA !--> - [x] C48mx500_3DVarAOWCDA <!-- JEDI low-res marine 3DVar cycled DA !--> - [x] C48mx500_hybAOWCDA <!-- JEDI marine hybrid envar cycled DA !--> - [ ] C96C48_hybatmDA <!-- GSI atm cycled DA !-->
…3238) This PR mostly includes configuration changes to allow the use a B-matrix at a defined resolution that may or may not be the same as the background. - Addition of an interpolation step in the B-matrix job - version update for the fix files - **the `gdas.cd` update should be the correct one now.** Resolves #3230 Resolves NOAA-EMC/GDASApp/issues/1375 # Dependencies - NOAA-EMC/GDASApp/pull/1441 - NOAA-EMC/jcb-gdas/pull/66 --------- Co-authored-by: Anna Shlyaeva <anna.v.shlyaeva@noaa.gov> Co-authored-by: RussTreadon-NOAA <26926959+RussTreadon-NOAA@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Rahul Mahajan <aerorahul@users.noreply.github.com>
description coming soon ...
Resolves part of NOAA-EMC/GDASApp#1375