Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore!: Replace unmaintained tui with ratatui #21285

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

DaughterOfMars
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR replaces the unmaintained tui with ratatui, resolving RUSTSEC-2023-0049. This is technically breaking to the move-bytecode-viewer public API, but this does not impact any internal crates and is unlikely to impact library users.

Test plan

How did you test the new or updated feature?


Release notes

Check each box that your changes affect. If none of the boxes relate to your changes, release notes aren't required.

For each box you select, include information after the relevant heading that describes the impact of your changes that a user might notice and any actions they must take to implement updates.

  • Protocol:
  • Nodes (Validators and Full nodes):
  • gRPC:
  • JSON-RPC:
  • GraphQL:
  • CLI:
  • Rust SDK:

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 19, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
sui-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 26, 2025 1:39pm
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
multisig-toolkit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 26, 2025 1:39pm
sui-kiosk ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 26, 2025 1:39pm

Copy link
Contributor

@tzakian tzakian left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you so much for these changes!

Looks like there's a couple conflicts and formatting issues that need to be resolved, but overall the changes look good to me and once those conflicts are resolved and the tests are passing I'll more than happily land this.

@DaughterOfMars
Copy link
Contributor Author

DaughterOfMars commented Feb 20, 2025

Thank you so much for these changes!

Looks like there's a couple conflicts and formatting issues that need to be resolved, but overall the changes look good to me and once those conflicts are resolved and the tests are passing I'll more than happily land this.

Fixed!

EDIT: Apparently it was not fixed, I must have mixed up branches. Should be fixed now.

@stefan-mysten
Copy link
Contributor

We got some fixes to the deps list, so we'd need to rebase. @DaughterOfMars would it be ok for you to rebase, fix conflicts and push again? If not, I can do it. Just let me know!

@DaughterOfMars
Copy link
Contributor Author

We got some fixes to the deps list, so we'd need to rebase. @DaughterOfMars would it be ok for you to rebase, fix conflicts and push again? If not, I can do it. Just let me know!

Done!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants