Feature/#61 extend each #78
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…t starting point of 1.
|
Oops I'm sorry, I didn't had time to check before. Thanks a lot for this! |
|
@LukyVj I'm assuming you haven't had time to review. Ping me if you need. |
|
Could you please fix the conflict :) ? And I'm mergin it |
Closed
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #61 #37 #67
Hi @LukyVj I needed the functionality requested in the previous issues so went ahead and wrote the code.
I'm using the
:nth-child(3n + 1)method, where 1 indicates the offset.Also updated the documentation and made
every()an actual alias ofeach()with a different default starting point. They now use the same logic.Caveats
each()mixinevery()it might break the current use so it's your call to keep them different or not.