Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

print thicket tree by node order (hatchet nid) instead of alphabetically #174

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 13, 2024

Conversation

dyokelson
Copy link
Collaborator

@dyokelson dyokelson commented Jun 13, 2024

This changes the printing of the thicket tree from alphabetical (frame) to node order (_hatchet_nid). If the profile does not have node ordering (from old caliper, or some other format) it will still sort the print by _hatchet_nid, which can be assigned alphabetically, possibly resulting in alphabetical printing of the thicket tree.

@dyokelson dyokelson added area-visualization Issues and PRs involving any of Thicket's provided visualizations status-ready-for-review This PR is ready to be reviewed by assigned reviewers type-feature Requests for new features or PRs which implement new features labels Jun 13, 2024
@dyokelson dyokelson added type-bug Identifies bugs in issues and identifies bug fixes in PRs and removed type-feature Requests for new features or PRs which implement new features labels Jun 13, 2024
dyokelson and others added 2 commits June 13, 2024 13:42
Co-authored-by: Michael McKinsey <MichaelMcKinsey1@gmail.com>
@pearce8 pearce8 merged commit 3950c53 into LLNL:develop Jun 13, 2024
4 checks passed
@slabasan slabasan added this to the 2024.2.0 milestone Sep 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-visualization Issues and PRs involving any of Thicket's provided visualizations status-ready-for-review This PR is ready to be reviewed by assigned reviewers type-bug Identifies bugs in issues and identifies bug fixes in PRs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants