-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 76
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Version check fails if latest
tag does not exist in registry
#89
Comments
Thanks for the report! Looking into it.
The GitHub maintained actions/setup-node action will setup the |
@hardillb
Using Clearly something is up, because you shouldn't be able to hit the version comparison logic with Update: the key here seems to be the lack of a |
Hi, The action is run as part of the flowforge/CloudProject which is private (and unfortunately currently can not be opened up). The repo is only used for our staging builds to provide early access and nightly builds of components before pushing to our staging environment. As you have noted none of the packages in the repo have a |
@hardillb thanks for the follow up, that makes sense. I have a solid repro locally using one of my own packages, so I think I'm good to move forward here. I have filed npm/cli#6408 for the "no I think your existing workaround of sticking with Two ideas right this second:
|
latest
tag does not exist in registry
Fix has been merged, I am planning on releasing as part of v2.1.0 tomorrow morning, eastern US time |
I'm getting an error with v2 when trying to publish a tagged build to a GH npm repo
Is giving the following error:
If I setup my an equivalent
.npmrc
file locally and runit returns an empty string implying that the GH npm repo doesn't support the npm view command
I'm guessing this is to do with it trying to check the version for
stagegy
changes in v2.Is there anyway to stop it doing this check? The release notes imply not and to use npm directly (but that means having to do all the .npmrc setup manually which is why I was using the action in the first place.
I'm going to roll back to v1 for now, but that is not a long term solution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: