You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The semantics of the changes to the build template link format are not exactly known. However, their meaning has been reverse-engineered to some degree. 0.3.0 and 0.4.0 added experimental support for the format changes. Once SotO is out (or hopefully before that if we get official feedback), the experimental fields should be revised to stabilize support for the new format.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There has been no official communication on the updated format yet and I'm not confident enough in preliminary findings to implement this at this time. Consequentially, I might reschedule this to 0.6.0 to get fixes for #2 and #4 out.
We've just received clarification about the changes. Proper support for the new format is implemented in 1c1c4ea. Next, I will evaluate if it's feasible to write a simple abstraction for the weapon types.
The semantics of the changes to the build template link format are not exactly known. However, their meaning has been reverse-engineered to some degree.
0.3.0
and0.4.0
added experimental support for the format changes. Once SotO is out (or hopefully before that if we get official feedback), the experimental fields should be revised to stabilize support for the new format.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: