Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 26, 2024. It is now read-only.

Consider also "maven.surefire.debug" environment variable while decid… #81

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 4, 2018
Merged

Consider also "maven.surefire.debug" environment variable while decid… #81

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 4, 2018

Conversation

skivol
Copy link

@skivol skivol commented Aug 29, 2018

…ing if we are debugging

  • to make debugging a more seamless process if started from command line using maven.

…ing if we are debugging

* to make debugging a more seamless process if started from command line using `maven`.
Copy link
Contributor

@splitfeed splitfeed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! 👍
Could we get some test coverage here as well?

@skivol
Copy link
Author

skivol commented Aug 30, 2018

Looks like some unrelated test failed ("shouldRetryOnFullConnectionPool", https://travis-ci.org/FortnoxAB/reactive-wizard/jobs/421932467), but can try increasing the coverage anyway :)

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 30, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #81 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 50%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master      #81   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     83.81%   83.81%           
- Complexity     1086     1088    +2     
=========================================
  Files           137      137           
  Lines          3064     3064           
  Branches        370      369    -1     
=========================================
  Hits           2568     2568           
  Misses          357      357           
  Partials        139      139
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...java/se/fortnox/reactivewizard/util/DebugUtil.java 50% <50%> (ø) 4 <2> (+2) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ee10159...0af5b0a. Read the comment docs.

@skivol
Copy link
Author

skivol commented Aug 30, 2018

How does one locally check that coverage/complexity goals are met? (mvn verify seems to pass just fine)

@splitfeed
Copy link
Contributor

I don't know if or how you can verify the codecov checks without pushing, but the failing tests are due to some flakyness. I reported one of these in #70, but it doesn't seem to be limited to that single test any longer.

…s (second attempt)

* by adding covering both branches for `isIdePresent` method.
@skivol
Copy link
Author

skivol commented Aug 31, 2018

Can we run the tests once again? :)

@skivol
Copy link
Author

skivol commented Sep 3, 2018

Any ideas on how to make "codecov/patch" happy? (don't know if kata-containers/tests#508 suggest a proper approach, but anyway :) )

@splitfeed
Copy link
Contributor

It looks strange, the coverage seems good to me. I'll just merge this :)

@splitfeed splitfeed merged commit b226ee5 into FortnoxAB:master Sep 4, 2018
@skivol
Copy link
Author

skivol commented Sep 4, 2018

Thanks :)
(Technically codecov-patch checks are maybe ok (but I don't understand how they work and whether it was possible to meet them in this case))

@skivol
Copy link
Author

skivol commented Sep 11, 2018

@splitfeed, so when is the next release? :)

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants