Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate AuthScreens to useOnyx #55528

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

WojtekBoman
Copy link
Contributor

@WojtekBoman WojtekBoman commented Jan 21, 2025

Explanation of Change

This PR includes the migration of withOnyx to useOnyx in AuthScreens. Additionally, it was necessary to make some navigation changes. Changes introduced in this PR:

  • fixed navigation state reset after logout
  • fixed default reportID value in ReportScreen
  • due to earlier AuthScreens rendering, two additional hooks were separated to handle the logic related to the values ​​​​obtained from useOnyx

Fixed Issues

$ #49103
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
  1. Verify that the login flow works the same as before the migration.
  2. Verify whether opening reports works the same as before the migration.

Offline tests

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
  1. Verify that the login flow works the same as before the migration.
  2. Verify whether opening reports works the same as before the migration.

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2025-01-21.at.15.32.35.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2025-01-21.at.15.29.02.mp4

Copy link
Contributor

@blazejkustra blazejkustra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me! 🚀

key: ONYXKEYS.ONYX_UPDATES_LAST_UPDATE_ID_APPLIED_TO_CLIENT,
},
})(AuthScreensMemoized);
export default memo(AuthScreens, () => true);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this memoization necessary?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point 👌 I believe it might be removed

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I decided to revert this change and wrap it with memo 🙈 It is safer to have it memoized

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No worries, lgtm either way

Copy link
Contributor

@adamgrzybowski adamgrzybowski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

@WojtekBoman WojtekBoman marked this pull request as ready for review January 22, 2025 15:17
@WojtekBoman WojtekBoman requested a review from a team as a code owner January 22, 2025 15:17
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from c3024 and MonilBhavsar January 22, 2025 15:17
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 22, 2025

@c3024 @MonilBhavsar One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team January 22, 2025 15:17
@c3024
Copy link
Contributor

c3024 commented Jan 23, 2025

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
authAndroid.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
authAndroidmWeb.mp4
iOS: Native
authiOS.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
authiOSmWeb.MP4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
authChrome.mov
MacOS: Desktop
authDesktop.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@c3024 c3024 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

This is exciting, great work @WojtekBoman!

});

Navigation.setParams(emptyParams, homeRoute?.key ?? '');
Onyx.set(ONYXKEYS.IS_CHECKING_PUBLIC_ROOM, false);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Curious why we didn't migrate this?

@deetergp deetergp merged commit fd66e86 into Expensify:main Jan 23, 2025
18 of 20 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/deetergp in version: 9.0.89-1 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 cancelled 🔪
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 cancelled 🔪
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 cancelled 🔪
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 cancelled 🔪

@@ -866,6 +866,7 @@ const CONST = {
CLOUDFRONT_URL,
EMPTY_ARRAY,
EMPTY_OBJECT,
EMPTY_STRING: '',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@WojtekBoman Could we please revert this? I understand why you did it but adding this constant will encourage contributors to use it to default String IDs and bypass our guidelines. We just had the same issue a while ago and we removed the same constant.

cc @MonilBhavsar @deetergp

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, thanks for noticing that :) I'll prepare a PR

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here's the PR #55714

Comment on lines +38 to +43
parse: {
reportID: (reportID: string | undefined) => reportID ?? CONST.EMPTY_STRING,
},
stringify: {
reportID: (reportID: string | undefined) => reportID ?? CONST.EMPTY_STRING,
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
parse: {
reportID: (reportID: string | undefined) => reportID ?? CONST.EMPTY_STRING,
},
stringify: {
reportID: (reportID: string | undefined) => reportID ?? CONST.EMPTY_STRING,
},
parse: {
// eslint-disable-next-line
reportID: (reportID: string | undefined) => reportID ?? '',
},
stringify: {
// eslint-disable-next-line
reportID: (reportID: string | undefined) => reportID ?? '',
},

@AndrewGable
Copy link
Contributor

Hello - This PR is causing this deploy blocker: #55681

We are going to revert this PR now. Please re-test with this blocker in mind, thank you!

yuwenmemon added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2025
Revert "Merge pull request #55528 from software-mansion-labs/use-onyx/auth-screens
OSBotify pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2025
Revert "Merge pull request #55528 from software-mansion-labs/use-onyx/auth-screens

(cherry picked from commit 9388747)

(CP triggered by yuwenmemon)
Julesssss added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2025
* main: (76 commits)
  Update Mobile-Expensify to 9.0.89-7
  Update version to 9.0.89-7
  Revert "Merge pull request #55528 from software-mansion-labs/use-onyx/auth-screens"
  Match the horizontal padding in the search router with LHN
  Update redirects.csv
  Fix padding in TravelTerms
  close RHP after provisioning
  Fix routes to work after page refresh
  Close RHP
  Fix bottom padding
  Add unit test
  Update redirects.csv
  Update and rename SAML-SSO.md to Managing-Single-Sign-On-(SSO)-in-Expensify.md
  Update SAML-SSO.md
  Make code more readable
  Add title in the header
  Fix lint errors
  Update comment
  Hide Split Expense from trip rooms
  Use TextLink and and styles instead of RenderHTML
  ...

# Conflicts:
#	Mobile-Expensify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/yuwenmemon in version: 9.0.89-8 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 true ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 failure ❌
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 success ✅

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/deetergp in version: 9.0.90-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 success ✅
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 success ✅

@WojtekBoman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello - This PR is causing this deploy blocker: #55681

We are going to revert this PR now. Please re-test with this blocker in mind, thank you!

Hey 👋
I started working on that 🫡

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/yuwenmemon in version: 9.0.90-6 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 true ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 failure ❌
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants