Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Search v2] [App] Create search results page #45409

Merged

Conversation

WojtekBoman
Copy link
Contributor

@WojtekBoman WojtekBoman commented Jul 15, 2024

Details

This PR adjusts the header of the Search page to display the custom query. The header displays the user's query when the route param isCustomQuery is set to true. This PR covers also adding the Filters button to the header.

Fixed Issues

$ #45028
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
  1. Navigate to the url with the isCustomQuery route param set to true, for example: https://dev.new.expensify.com:8082/search?q=type%3Aexpense%20status%3Aall&isCustomQuery=true
  2. Verify if the header is displayed correctly

Offline tests

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-07-26.at.16.35.24.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-07-26.at.15.59.01.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-07-26.at.16.42.35.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-07-26.at.15.59.35.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-07-26.at.16.52.31.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-07-26.at.16.53.37.mov

@luacmartins luacmartins self-requested a review July 16, 2024 17:07
Copy link
Member

@Kicu Kicu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good job, code looks pretty nice I left some minor comments

@@ -21,9 +21,12 @@ type HeaderProps = {

/** Additional header container styles */
containerStyles?: StyleProp<ViewStyle>;

/** Whether the subtitle should be displayed above the title */
showSubtitleAboveTitle?: boolean;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Im not sure, but If I recall correctly, then our Header for SearchResults is temporary until v2.3. So if this is a temporary header, then do we have to modify the core component Header?
Could we do some dirty fix instead, and leave a comment that it's temporary?

Im afraid that in future we will change our Search header, but nobody will remember to clean up components/Header.
Does this make sense and is there anything you can come up with?

@WojtekBoman WojtekBoman marked this pull request as ready for review July 26, 2024 14:57
@WojtekBoman WojtekBoman requested review from a team as code owners July 26, 2024 14:57
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team July 26, 2024 14:57
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 26, 2024

@ikevin127 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from ikevin127 July 26, 2024 14:57
Copy link
Contributor

@luacmartins luacmartins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good. Left a few comments

BUG: Other filters don't show up in the supertitle. For example, manually changing the URL to /search?q=type%3Aexpense%20status%3Aall%20category%3AUncategorized&isCustomQuery=true still shows the canned search, instead of type:expense status:all category:Uncategorized

Screenshot 2024-07-26 at 9 23 50 AM

};

function Header({title = '', subtitle = '', textStyles = [], containerStyles = [], shouldShowEnvironmentBadge = false}: HeaderProps) {
function Header({title = '', subtitle = '', textStyles = [], containerStyles = [], shouldShowEnvironmentBadge = false, showSubtitleAboveTitle = false}: HeaderProps) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB supertitle is a common word used for this subtitle above title

Suggested change
function Header({title = '', subtitle = '', textStyles = [], containerStyles = [], shouldShowEnvironmentBadge = false, showSubtitleAboveTitle = false}: HeaderProps) {
function Header({title = '', subtitle = '', textStyles = [], containerStyles = [], shouldShowEnvironmentBadge = false, shouldShowSupertitle = false}: HeaderProps) {

hash: number;
data: TransactionListItemType[] | ReportListItemType[];
searchType: SearchDataTypes;
isMobileSelectionModeActive?: boolean;
setIsMobileSelectionModeActive?: (isMobileSelectionModeActive: boolean) => void;
isCustomQueryMode?: boolean;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
isCustomQueryMode?: boolean;
isCustomQuery?: boolean;

Comment on lines 231 to 236
<Button
onPress={() => Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.SEARCH_ADVANCED_FILTERS)}
text={translate('search.filtersHeader')}
icon={Expensicons.Filters}
medium
/>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should remove this button until some of the filters work, e.g. type, status, date and categories that are already merged/in review. Then we add this button to start showing this. Otherwise, we'd either have to block merging this PR until those filters work or it'd be really confusing to navigate to the filter page when it doesn't do anything.

Suggested change
<Button
onPress={() => Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.SEARCH_ADVANCED_FILTERS)}
text={translate('search.filtersHeader')}
icon={Expensicons.Filters}
medium
/>

@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ type CentralPaneScreensParamList = {
// Param types of the search central pane are also used for the search bottom tab screen.
[SCREENS.SEARCH.CENTRAL_PANE]: {
q: SearchQueryString;
isCustomQuery: boolean;
isCustomQuery: string;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why this change? isCustomQuery implies a bool to me

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's a bit misleading because this parameter is stored as a string in route.params, and we need to parse it to boolean when we read it in the component

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah this looks surprising but I believe its correct to type it like this. Everything that comes from route query params will always be a string I believe

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm maybe we should create custom param parser in the linking config? It would simply parse string to boolean earlier to keep boolean in the state. It's weird that we use string for something like that.


const {policyIDs} = route.params;
const isCustomQueryMode = SearchUtils.isCustomQuery(route.params);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's rename all of these instances

Suggested change
const isCustomQueryMode = SearchUtils.isCustomQuery(route.params);
const isCustomQuery = SearchUtils.isCustomQuery(route.params);

Comment on lines 81 to 85
<Button
icon={Expensicons.Filters}
onPress={() => Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.SEARCH_ADVANCED_FILTERS)}
innerStyles={styles.searchNarrowFilterButton}
/>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here

Suggested change
<Button
icon={Expensicons.Filters}
onPress={() => Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.SEARCH_ADVANCED_FILTERS)}
innerStyles={styles.searchNarrowFilterButton}
/>

@ikevin127
Copy link
Contributor

ikevin127 commented Jul 26, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android.webm
Android: mWeb Chrome
android-mweb.webm
iOS: Native
ios.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios-mweb.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari web
MacOS: Desktop desktop

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

To me, we should loop through the AST tree and parse the values ​​stored there to the capitalized text.

We should use SearchUtils.getFilters and pick only the filters that are needed, i.e. everything in SYNTAX_FILTER_KEYS and type and status in SYNTAX_ROOT_KEYS

App/src/CONST.ts

Lines 5289 to 5310 in 410a6f2

SYNTAX_ROOT_KEYS: {
TYPE: 'type',
STATUS: 'status',
SORT_BY: 'sortBy',
SORT_ORDER: 'sortOrder',
},
SYNTAX_FILTER_KEYS: {
DATE: 'date',
AMOUNT: 'amount',
EXPENSE_TYPE: 'expenseType',
CURRENCY: 'currency',
MERCHANT: 'merchant',
DESCRIPTION: 'description',
FROM: 'from',
TO: 'to',
CATEGORY: 'category',
TAG: 'tag',
TAX_RATE: 'taxRate',
CARD_ID: 'cardID',
REPORT_ID: 'reportID',
KEYWORD: 'keyword',
},

@ikevin127
Copy link
Contributor

ikevin127 commented Jul 29, 2024

Also, I'm not sure if it's been reported, but the bottom sheet is missing the scrim/overlay:

@dubielzyk-expensify That's only happening on local dev due to StrictMode, I debunked it in #46096 (comment).

To recap, based on the latest comments on the discrepancies reported in #45409 (comment) this is what I gather:

  • 1. Wide Layout - Filter labels are lowercase and missing spaces

✅ Design team confirmed in #45409 (comment) that the correct design is the one shown in the design doc. We also got confirmation in #45409 (comment) that the Filters lowercase / no-spaces is to be left untouched for now - no changes required here.

  • 2. Narrow Layout - Incorrect filter dropdown icon color and padding between icons and text

✅ Design team confirmed in #45409 (comment) that we don't currently use the green icon in this case, therefore we shouldn't change that here - no changes required here.

  • 3. Narrow Layout - Filter button icon not centered on native app

✅ Looks like the Filter button with icon only was removed in the meantime via commit bcd2f8d, therefore this is not an issue anymore - no other changes required here.

  • 4. Narrow Layout - Filter dropdown opens search selection modal (this one is probably NAB but I wanted to bring this up because I wasn't sure)

✅ This issue was addressed by design team in #45409 (comment) and #45409 (comment) and was demonstrated by author in #45409 (comment) as the correct behaviour.

Please correct me if I left anything out!

♻️ Given the above context, I think I can move forward w/ completing the reviewer checklist.

🟢 Update: Completed PR Reviewer Checklist. Will Approve once all code change requests are addressed and conflicts resolved - will perform a double-check on the functionality.

@WojtekBoman
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ikevin127 All comments have been resolved :) Could you recheck it?

Copy link
Contributor

@luacmartins luacmartins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM and tests well. @ikevin127 all yours!

@luacmartins luacmartins requested a review from Kicu July 30, 2024 16:48
Copy link
Contributor

@ikevin127 ikevin127 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from luacmartins July 30, 2024 17:24
luacmartins
luacmartins previously approved these changes Jul 30, 2024
@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

@WojtekBoman we have conflicts 😞 Otherwise, looks good to be merged

@WojtekBoman
Copy link
Contributor Author

@luacmartins Solved :)

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

@WojtekBoman :hero:

@luacmartins luacmartins merged commit 8942513 into Expensify:main Jul 30, 2024
14 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 9.0.15-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Aug 2, 2024

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 9.0.15-9 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants