Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Default badge style #40101

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Apr 23, 2024
Merged

Default badge style #40101

merged 13 commits into from
Apr 23, 2024

Conversation

dragnoir
Copy link
Contributor

@dragnoir dragnoir commented Apr 11, 2024

Details

This PR will remove additional styling to badge component, make the square style as default, add error and success props.

Changes for the badge component:

  • always uses the "bordered" style as a default
  • has a prop for error/danger that turns the border red
  • has a prop for success that turns the border green

Fixed Issues

$ #38471
PROPOSAL: #38471 (comment)

Tests

  1. Click on profile
  2. Check the badge on the right of Wallet menu item
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  1. Click on profile
  2. Check the badge on the right of Wallet menu item
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

image

Android: mWeb Chrome

image

iOS: Native

image

iOS: mWeb Safari

image

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

image

MacOS: Desktop

image

@dragnoir
Copy link
Contributor Author

Screenshots from the UI where all styles props are removed:

image

image

image

image

image

image

@dragnoir
Copy link
Contributor Author

Error:

image

Success:

image

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Looking good! When the badge has an icon and is state=error, we want the icon to use the danger red color as the icon fill. And when the badge has an icon and is state=success, we want the icon to use the success green color as the icon fill.

@dragnoir
Copy link
Contributor Author

Badge default light:

image

Badge default dark:

image

Badge success light:

image

Badge sucess dark:

image

Badge error light:

image

Badge error dark:

image

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Nice, can you do that same line up but show them with icons too?

@dragnoir
Copy link
Contributor Author

Badge with icon default light:

image

Badge with icon default dark:

image

Badge with icon success light:

image

Badge with icon sucess dark:

image

Badge with icon error light:

image

Badge with icon error dark:

image

@dragnoir dragnoir marked this pull request as ready for review April 11, 2024 17:27
@dragnoir dragnoir requested review from a team as code owners April 11, 2024 17:27
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from arosiclair and removed request for a team April 11, 2024 17:27
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 11, 2024

@arosiclair Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@dragnoir
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shawnborton if you want to assign a reviewer!

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

I'll give it a review, going to run a test build now. cc @Expensify/design as well.

This comment has been minimized.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this broke the environment labels we use:
CleanShot 2024-04-11 at 20 17 27@2x

I think we could keep those environment labels as separate one-off styles since they are only used near the wordmark logo, to my knowledge at least.

@arosiclair
Copy link
Contributor

@Santhosh-Sellavel you're the reviewer for the other PR. Can you also review this one?

Copy link
Contributor

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Badge shape looks better, but colors are incorrect - adhoc uses a darker shade of pink:
CleanShot 2024-04-12 at 10 50 30@2x

@dragnoir
Copy link
Contributor Author

fixed:

image

image

image

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good, let's get this one into final review? cc @arosiclair @Santhosh-Sellavel

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Resolve Conflicts please

@dragnoir
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shawnborton just for info.

The badge component supports a pressable prop, that makes it clickable and then support hover effect.

pressable = false,

when the component seeks for the style here

App/src/styles/utils/index.ts

Lines 1246 to 1263 in c75c85f

getBadgeColorStyle: (isSuccess: boolean, isError: boolean, isPressed = false, isAdHoc = false): ViewStyle => {
if (isSuccess) {
if (isAdHoc) {
// TODO: Remove this "eslint-disable-next" once the theme switching migration is done and styles are fully typed (GH Issue: https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/27337)
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-return
return isPressed ? styles.badgeAdHocSuccessPressed : styles.badgeAdHocSuccess;
}
// TODO: Remove this "eslint-disable-next" once the theme switching migration is done and styles are fully typed (GH Issue: https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/27337)
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-return
return isPressed ? styles.badgeSuccessPressed : styles.badgeSuccess;
}
if (isError) {
// TODO: Remove this "eslint-disable-next" once the theme switching migration is done and styles are fully typed (GH Issue: https://github.com/Expensify/App/issues/27337)
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-return
return isPressed ? styles.badgeDangerPressed : styles.badgeDanger;
}
return {};
},

it will check if it's isPressed to load another style.
You can see it when you keep clicking in the small badge under the logo

20240416_153341.mp4

The new design will need a style for the isPressed, However, we currently don't have any cases where we're using the isPressed state in our styles.
image

Just wanted to give you a heads up about this. Let me know if you have any questions or need this to be considered now.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Sounds good, I don't think any badges need to be able to be pressable at the moment though but we can just leave this as-is.

What else do we need to do to get this one over the finish line? Would love to wrap this up so we can also get the report next steps banner PR merged as well. Thanks Rachid!

@dragnoir
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you @shawnborton solving conflicts now.

@dragnoir
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Santhosh-Sellavel conflicts solved. Please review.

@dragnoir
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Santhosh-Sellavel friendly pumb!

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Santhosh-Sellavel commented Apr 19, 2024

Thanks will try to get this today or by this weekend.

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Santhosh-Sellavel commented Apr 21, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Screenshot_1713728494

Android: mWeb Chrome

Screenshot_1713726064

iOS: Native

Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 15 Pro - 2024-04-22 at 01 26 40

iOS: mWeb Safari

Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 15 Pro - 2024-04-22 at 01 19 50

MacOS: Chrome / Safari & MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-04-22.at.12.26.26.AM.mov

Copy link
Collaborator

@Santhosh-Sellavel Santhosh-Sellavel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, Thanks!

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 21, 2024

🎯 @Santhosh-Sellavel, thanks for reviewing and testing this PR! 🎉

An E/App issue has been created to issue payment here: #40663.

@dragnoir
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shawnborton do you think I can get paid too here? 😅

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

@dragnoir yup, requested that here

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Can we try to get this one merged soon? This way we can unblock the PR here. Thanks!

@dragnoir
Copy link
Contributor Author

@arosiclair I think we need your review here!

@arosiclair arosiclair merged commit 3a3cef6 into Expensify:main Apr 23, 2024
16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/arosiclair in version: 1.4.65-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.4.65-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants