Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for Chef InSpec #6990

Closed
LOLCATATONIA opened this issue Oct 14, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Support for Chef InSpec #6990

LOLCATATONIA opened this issue Oct 14, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@LOLCATATONIA
Copy link

Please support integration with Chef InSpec. I thought it was already supported, but I can't find it listed on https://github.com/DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo/tree/master/dojo/tools ?

@mtesauro
Copy link
Contributor

@LOLCATATONIA Do you have an example output file from Chef InSpec you can share? If so adding it to this repo - https://github.com/DefectDojo/sample-scan-files is a great way to assist getting a new parser added to DefectDojo.

The example file doesn't have to have 'real' data in it - just have reasonable data and keeps the structure of the tools output. For example, I added a BugCrowd file to that repo but have never worked for 'BigCorp'. I simply took legit output from a tool and removed/re-wrote anything that might identify the actual source. Some contributors have scanned open source / known vulnerable apps (OWASP JuiceShop) to produce output files as well.

HTH

@LOLCATATONIA
Copy link
Author

inspec_audit.log

Here's a sample file. I had trouble pulling that repo.

manuel-sommer added a commit to manuel-sommer/django-DefectDojo that referenced this issue Jan 15, 2024
mtesauro pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 19, 2024
* ✨ implement chefinspect, #6990

* force add unittestfiles against gitignore

* 🐛 fix according to comment

* 🐛 fix
@manuel-sommer
Copy link
Contributor

This issue can be closed @mtesauro

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants