Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Explore] Investigate changes needed for the merge #459

Closed
jframe opened this issue Dec 6, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

[Explore] Investigate changes needed for the merge #459

jframe opened this issue Dec 6, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
TeamCerberus Under active development by TeamCerberus @Consensys

Comments

@jframe
Copy link
Contributor

jframe commented Dec 6, 2021

Investigate what impact the merge has on Web3Signer and what changes if any are needed.

Already identified

Acceptance Criteria

  • Identify what changes are needed to Web3Signer to support the merge
  • Document how the changes affect Web3Signer
  • Identify when this needs to be done by
  • What testnets are available
@jframe jframe added the TeamCerberus Under active development by TeamCerberus @Consensys label Dec 6, 2021
@ryanjjones10 ryanjjones10 changed the title Investigate changes needed for the merge [Explore] Investigate changes needed for the merge Jan 25, 2022
@jframe jframe self-assigned this Feb 2, 2022
@jframe jframe closed this as completed Feb 7, 2022
@jframe jframe mentioned this issue Feb 22, 2022
3 tasks
@jframe
Copy link
Contributor Author

jframe commented Feb 22, 2022

Changes needed for Web3signer. For Bellatrix either the Beacon block body needs to be updated to include the execution payload or the beacon block body is replaced with the beacon block body root. Preferred approach is to use the beacon body root #437 as this will reduce that amount data is sent, parsed and simplify the API.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
TeamCerberus Under active development by TeamCerberus @Consensys
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant