Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: Consistent style and event description #5

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 16, 2022
Merged

refactor: Consistent style and event description #5

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 16, 2022

Conversation

Apegurus
Copy link

No description provided.

@Apegurus Apegurus requested a review from DeFiFoFum November 16, 2022 15:37
Copy link

@DeFiFoFum DeFiFoFum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking hawt

@Apegurus Apegurus merged commit aa09fae into draft Nov 16, 2022
DeFiFoFum pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2023
* Propose Multi-Resource Token standard

RMRK team has developed a next step in NFTs where one NFT can be tied to
multiple resources.

* Address issues reported by EIP repository's CI

* Fix styling discrepancies in section titles

* Address CI's issues in the preabmle

* Add discussion URL

* Fix discussion URL formatting

* Add the EIP number

* Fix getResourceMeta specification

* Apply changes based on PR comments

* Replace "primitive" with a clearer explanation

Co-authored-by: Pandapip1 <45835846+Pandapip1@users.noreply.github.com>

* Apply changes based on ECH call #5

Applied the changes based on feedback received on the EIP Editing Office
Hour Meeting #5.

This commit includes changes to the proposal as well as adds an exaple
implementation to assets/ directory.

* Address the stylistic issues reported by the CI

* Fix a reference to EIP-712

* Minor typo fixes

* Updates `getResourceMetadata` description

Co-authored-by: Sam Wilson <57262657+SamWilsn@users.noreply.github.com>

* Rename MultiResource -> MultiAsset and relicense

The proposal was renamed to Context-Dependent Multi-Asset Tokens to
better illustrate its function.

Another example was added to represent the possible IoT usecase and the
explanation on the naming decision was added to the rationale.

The examples were relicensed to CC0, to conform to the requirements of
EIP repository.

* Fix license identifier & Specification contract title

* Fix indexes of Rationale questions

* Minor polishing of the rationale

* Update references to assets to use an istead of a in Rationale

* Final polishes

Co-authored-by: Pandapip1 <45835846+Pandapip1@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Steven Pineda <steven2308@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Sam Wilson <57262657+SamWilsn@users.noreply.github.com>
DeFiFoFum pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
* EIP Motivation and Specification for "Multi-operator, per-token ERC721 approval."

* Add remaining authors' names

* Interface overhaul with explanation in EIP markdown.

* Add `Abstract` and `@dev` note about interplay with `setApprovalForAll()`.

* Partial response to cxkoda review

* Full response to cxkoda review

* Explicitly include OZ `IERC{165,721}.sol` instead of using a submodule

* Minor typo and wording changes to draft.

* Prune authors to active participants as they can always be re-added later

* Revert `.gitignore` so as to not change it in the EIP draft (#7)

* Set presumptive EIP number and fix linter complaints (#5)

* Rename files and directories to include EIP number

* Address linter (`EIP Walidator`) issues

* Add presumed EIP number based on PR: 6464

* Revert `.gitignore` to get through initial draft acceptance

* Do the last commit properly ;)

* Add ERC category

* Fix linter issues (ethereum#8)

* Update EIP- references to ERC-

* Remove OpenZeppelin interfaces and replace with original EIP versions; change 6464 license to CC0

* Add `solidity` language tag to code block
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants