Update nbdev_stdlib symbol index with latest Python stdlib symbols #39
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Super! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a dependency of
create_indexfrom nbdev.doclink (currently still only a PR), which now handles the behavior of creating an index using the sphinx index file. A change was made to thiscreate_indexfunction to allow for built-ins to be properly handled for thenbdev_stdlibindex. This only impacts the mk_index.py function. However, I did test it out by recreating thenbdev_stdlibindex. I'm unsure if this is the proper way to do it, or if I should revert that and just wait for the CI to perform it.