Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adapt to coq/coq#16743 (fix incomplete checking of unsolved holes) #465

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2022

Conversation

SkySkimmer
Copy link
Contributor

@SkySkimmer SkySkimmer commented Nov 22, 2022

Alternatively we could define exploit as a Tactic Notation taking
open_constr or uconstr (the problem is that arguments to a
non-notation Ltac get interpreted as constr which doesn't allow holes,
but in this case a hole gets solved by typeclass inference leaving a
new hole behing, and due to the bug the new hole isn't detected).

Alternatively we could define `exploit` as a Tactic Notation taking
open_constr or uconstr (the problem is that arguments to a
non-notation Ltac get interpreted as constr which doesn't allow holes,
but in this case a hole gets solved by typeclass inference leaving a
new hole behing, and due to the bug the new hole isn't detected).
@xavierleroy
Copy link
Contributor

I'm fine with this change, even though I don't understand a word of the explanations :-)

Why is this submitted as a draft PR ?

@SkySkimmer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Reflex from the usual way we do this

@SkySkimmer SkySkimmer marked this pull request as ready for review November 23, 2022 11:23
@ppedrot
Copy link
Contributor

ppedrot commented Nov 24, 2022

Please merge now.

@xavierleroy xavierleroy merged commit 5be9ae2 into AbsInt:master Nov 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants