Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: bug block not been processed yet #302

Conversation

joanestebanr
Copy link
Contributor

@joanestebanr joanestebanr commented Feb 21, 2025

Description

Sequencer Sender take more than expected to submit a new sequence. The logs shows next reason:

error getting sequences: error calling GetLatestInfoUntilBlock with block num 21877573: given block(s) have not been processed yet

This is because there are an error on downloaderriver that have a high occurence when the sync finality is finalizedBlock.

  • affected version: 0.5.1

@joanestebanr joanestebanr self-assigned this Feb 21, 2025
@joanestebanr joanestebanr changed the base branch from release/v0.5.1 to release/v0.5.x February 21, 2025 09:50
@joanestebanr joanestebanr marked this pull request as ready for review February 21, 2025 09:59
@Stefan-Ethernal Stefan-Ethernal force-pushed the fix/getting_sequences_block_have_not_been_processed_yet branch from 1083ec7 to c498e4f Compare February 23, 2025 12:57
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
B Maintainability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE

@joanestebanr joanestebanr merged commit 9cb953a into release/v0.5.x Feb 24, 2025
24 of 25 checks passed
@joanestebanr joanestebanr deleted the fix/getting_sequences_block_have_not_been_processed_yet branch February 24, 2025 09:22
@Stefan-Ethernal Stefan-Ethernal mentioned this pull request Feb 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants