Fix Typo in PDT 4.53 and 4.54

[amilan17]

Summary and purpose

Typo in Product definition template 4.53 and Product definition template 4.54. 

Note says "see Code table 4.PTN..".

[amilan17]

see Attachment IV - Definition of "tiles" with time dependent attributes

[amilan17]

Sibylle and Sebastien can help

[sebvi]

I have checked the original proposal (From IPET-DRC-IV, document 2.2_5).
There is a table in the proposal called 4.233 but in the actual manual on code 4.233 is something else (aerosol type). I suspect a clash between 2 proposals during that fast track and it eventually became 4.234 (and the template originally numbered 4.52 and 4.53 became 4.53 and 4.54).
I suspect it is that table 4.234 that should be referenced by the templates but we should check with @efucile as he was the proposer of the templates at the time.

[sebvi]

Hi @amilan17 , did you check with @efucile if my analysis is correct? If yes we could create the branch

[SibylleK]

Dear @amilan17, I think "4.PTN" is intended and not a typo, as PTN should be defined in octet 12 in PDT 4.53 or 4.54 and could be either 234 - "Canopy cover fraction" or 236 - "Soil texture fraction".

[efucile]

Yes @SibylleK you are right. The template was generalised and the Partition Table Number is in octet 12. This is not a typo.

[amilan17]

@efucile @SibylleK does it make sense to replace 4.PTN with Code table 4.234 and Code table 4.236? I ask, because we recently introduced a way in GitHub to reference the code tables in a column. As displayed in the image below. 

[amilan17]

@efucile @SibylleK Can you please respond to my question above? I'd like to finalize this for FT22-1 within a week.

[sebvi]

I think the answer was given in an email: the product definition templates are correct because the table 4.PTN is not predetermined. I can try to dig the email with @efucile comments.

[amilan17]

no changes needed in CSV or PDF