Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(turbo-tasks): Use Return Position Impl Traits (RPIT) to reimplement GraphTraversal #74896

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

bgw
Copy link
Member

@bgw bgw commented Jan 15, 2025

Reimplements GraphTraversal without the manual Future implementation. This was part of an experiment to try to use RPIT in the Visit trait, but I didn't quite get that far.

This code likely didn't use RPIT when it was written because RPIT on traits wasn't stable (or even fully implemented in rustc?) at that time.

This removes some unsafe code and a use of the unstable nightly-only impl_trait_in_assoc_type feature.

Closes PACK-3796

@ijjk ijjk added the created-by: Turbopack team PRs by the Turbopack team. label Jan 15, 2025
Copy link
Member Author

bgw commented Jan 15, 2025

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@bgw bgw changed the title Use RPIT for GraphTraversal refactor(turbo-tasks): Use Return Position Impl Traits (RPIT) to implement Jan 15, 2025
@bgw bgw changed the title refactor(turbo-tasks): Use Return Position Impl Traits (RPIT) to implement refactor(turbo-tasks): Use Return Position Impl Traits (RPIT) to implement GraphTraversal Jan 15, 2025
@bgw bgw changed the title refactor(turbo-tasks): Use Return Position Impl Traits (RPIT) to implement GraphTraversal refactor(turbo-tasks): Use Return Position Impl Traits (RPIT) to reimplement GraphTraversal Jan 15, 2025
@bgw bgw requested a review from mischnic January 15, 2025 02:12
@bgw bgw marked this pull request as ready for review January 15, 2025 02:12
@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Jan 15, 2025

Stats from current PR

Default Build (Increase detected ⚠️)
General
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js bgw/visit-rpit Change
buildDuration 17.8s 15.2s N/A
buildDurationCached 14.3s 12.1s N/A
nodeModulesSize 418 MB 418 MB
nextStartRea..uration (ms) 413ms 420ms N/A
Client Bundles (main, webpack)
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js bgw/visit-rpit Change
5306-HASH.js gzip 53.9 kB 53.9 kB N/A
8276.HASH.js gzip 169 B 168 B N/A
8377-HASH.js gzip 5.44 kB 5.44 kB N/A
bccd1874-HASH.js gzip 52.9 kB 52.9 kB N/A
framework-HASH.js gzip 57.5 kB 57.5 kB N/A
main-app-HASH.js gzip 240 B 242 B N/A
main-HASH.js gzip 34.2 kB 34.2 kB N/A
webpack-HASH.js gzip 1.71 kB 1.71 kB N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js bgw/visit-rpit Change
polyfills-HASH.js gzip 39.4 kB 39.4 kB
Overall change 39.4 kB 39.4 kB
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js bgw/visit-rpit Change
_app-HASH.js gzip 193 B 193 B
_error-HASH.js gzip 193 B 193 B
amp-HASH.js gzip 512 B 510 B N/A
css-HASH.js gzip 343 B 342 B N/A
dynamic-HASH.js gzip 1.84 kB 1.84 kB
edge-ssr-HASH.js gzip 265 B 265 B
head-HASH.js gzip 363 B 362 B N/A
hooks-HASH.js gzip 393 B 392 B N/A
image-HASH.js gzip 4.57 kB 4.57 kB N/A
index-HASH.js gzip 268 B 268 B
link-HASH.js gzip 2.35 kB 2.34 kB N/A
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip 328 B 328 B
script-HASH.js gzip 397 B 397 B
withRouter-HASH.js gzip 323 B 326 B N/A
1afbb74e6ecf..834.css gzip 106 B 106 B
Overall change 3.59 kB 3.59 kB
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js bgw/visit-rpit Change
_buildManifest.js gzip 749 B 747 B N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js bgw/visit-rpit Change
index.html gzip 524 B 524 B
link.html gzip 539 B 538 B N/A
withRouter.html gzip 520 B 520 B
Overall change 1.04 kB 1.04 kB
Edge SSR bundle Size
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js bgw/visit-rpit Change
edge-ssr.js gzip 129 kB 129 kB N/A
page.js gzip 208 kB 208 kB N/A
Overall change 0 B 0 B
Middleware size
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js bgw/visit-rpit Change
middleware-b..fest.js gzip 669 B 665 B N/A
middleware-r..fest.js gzip 155 B 156 B N/A
middleware.js gzip 31.3 kB 31.3 kB N/A
edge-runtime..pack.js gzip 844 B 844 B
Overall change 844 B 844 B
Next Runtimes
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js bgw/visit-rpit Change
274-experime...dev.js gzip 322 B 322 B
274.runtime.dev.js gzip 314 B 314 B
app-page-exp...dev.js gzip 374 kB 374 kB
app-page-exp..prod.js gzip 130 kB 130 kB
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip 143 kB 143 kB
app-page-tur..prod.js gzip 139 kB 139 kB
app-page.run...dev.js gzip 362 kB 362 kB
app-page.run..prod.js gzip 126 kB 126 kB
app-route-ex...dev.js gzip 37.6 kB 37.6 kB
app-route-ex..prod.js gzip 25.6 kB 25.6 kB
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip 25.6 kB 25.6 kB
app-route-tu..prod.js gzip 25.4 kB 25.4 kB
app-route.ru...dev.js gzip 39.2 kB 39.2 kB
app-route.ru..prod.js gzip 25.4 kB 25.4 kB
pages-api-tu..prod.js gzip 9.69 kB 9.69 kB
pages-api.ru...dev.js gzip 11.6 kB 11.6 kB
pages-api.ru..prod.js gzip 9.68 kB 9.68 kB
pages-turbo...prod.js gzip 21.7 kB 21.7 kB
pages.runtim...dev.js gzip 27.5 kB 27.5 kB
pages.runtim..prod.js gzip 21.7 kB 21.7 kB
server.runti..prod.js gzip 916 kB 916 kB
Overall change 2.47 MB 2.47 MB
build cache Overall increase ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary vercel/next.js bgw/visit-rpit Change
0.pack gzip 2.09 MB 2.1 MB ⚠️ +1.76 kB
index.pack gzip 75.4 kB 76 kB ⚠️ +614 B
Overall change 2.17 MB 2.17 MB ⚠️ +2.38 kB
Diff details
Diff for main-HASH.js

Diff too large to display

Commit: 0ca6d35

@bgw bgw requested review from wbinnssmith and kdy1 January 15, 2025 19:11
@bgw bgw merged commit dae2f03 into canary Jan 23, 2025
135 checks passed
@bgw bgw deleted the bgw/visit-rpit branch January 23, 2025 16:38
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked label Feb 7, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 7, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
created-by: Turbopack team PRs by the Turbopack team. locked
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants