Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Required signature standards (#1247)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Co-authored-by: OJCubing <40577393+OJCubing@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ohexter <116421789+ohexter@users.noreply.github.com>
  • Loading branch information
3 people authored Oct 30, 2024
1 parent 7e57df5 commit 7948c3b
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 9 additions and 5 deletions.
5 changes: 4 additions & 1 deletion wca-guidelines.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -198,6 +198,10 @@ To be more informative, each Guideline is classified using one of the following
- A6b1+) [EXPLANATION] The arbitrary value of 0.06 seconds was chosen to accommodate concerns about Stackmat timer malfunctions.
- A6e+) [CLARIFICATION] If the puzzle falls into the lap of the competitor after stopping the timer, this is considered touching the puzzle.
- A7c+) [ADDITION] If a result signed by a competitor is found to be incomplete or unreadable, it should be interpreted the worst reasonable way (e.g. "1:05" will be considered 1:05.99, "25.X3" will be considered 25.73 if X could be either a 1 or a 7). Given that the Stackmat timer displays a time of X:0Y.ss as X:Y.ss, a missing tens digit should be considered more likely than a missing ones digit (e.g. "1:2.27" will be considered 1:02.27). The judge who signed an ambiguous result may be requested to clarify it, at the discretion of the score taker.
- A7c6+) [EXAMPLE] Examples of signatures that identify the competitor: Name, initials, WCA ID, competition registrant ID, a reasonable nickname.
- A7c6++) [EXPLANATION] A competition registrant ID is an identifier (e.g. a number) assigned to a competitor for the competition. Some competitions use this to keep track of score sheets and enter results.
- A7c6+++) [RECOMMENDATION] The organization team may request competitors to sign with one particular method of identification (e.g. competition registrant ID), but competitors should not be disqualified for using a different method when signing.
- A7c6++++) [ADDITION] Competitors should use the same signature when they are judging and/or scrambling at the competition.
- A7g+) [EXAMPLE] Examples of incidents that could grant a competitor an extra attempt due to inexperience: not waiting for the green light, improperly starting or stopping the timer, going over inspection time due to misunderstanding how to start a solve, or other procedural time penalties.
- A7g++) [CLARIFICATION] Individual penalties cannot be waived. A full extra attempt must be granted.
- A7g+++) [RECOMMENDATION] The WCA Delegate should use stronger discretion when granting more than one extra attempt to the same competitor. If more than one extra attempt is granted, it should be for a different type of incident. Example: if the WCA Delegate already awarded an extra attempt for a competitor who did not wait long enough for the green light, they should not award another extra attempt if that competitor fails to wait long enough for the green light again.
Expand All @@ -224,7 +228,6 @@ To be more informative, each Guideline is classified using one of the following
- E2a1+) [RECOMMENDATION] If a judge finds a submitted solution that does not appear to have information to identify the attempt, they should check both sides of the paper.
- E2b+) [CLARIFICATION] A competitor may choose to stop an attempt early by handing in a solution before the time limit.
- E2c+) [CLARIFICATION] Although the judge may provide a standard sheet for competitors to submit solutions, a competitor may submit a solution on a different piece of paper. (Note that the piece of paper must come from the judge, according to [Regulation E3a](regulations:regulation:E3a).)
- E2c1+) [EXPLANATION] A competition registrant ID is an identifier (e.g. a number) assigned to a competitor for the competition. Some competitions use this to keep track of score sheets and enter results.
- E2c1++) [ADDITION] If the competitor forgot to write information to identify the attempt on their intended solution paper, they are permitted to add it in front of a judge after the time limit. In this case, the competitor must ask the judge while submitting their solution and then immediately write information to identify the attempt (without making other changes) under direct supervision of the judge. Once a competitor has finished submitting their solution (e.g. placing it in the judge's hands and allowing the judge to move on to the next competitor, placing it on the judge's table and walking away), they are not permitted to add any information. If the competitor writes anything after the time limit but before asking the judge, the attempt remains disqualified (DNF).
- E2c1+++) [EXPLANATION] The competitor is not required to write the competition name, round, and/or attempt number on their submitted paper, but may wish to do so in order to help the organization team keep track of submitted solutions.
- E2c1++++) [ADDITION] If a judge finds a submitted solution without information to identify the attempt (e.g. while grading the attempt), they should find out the competitor who wrote the solution in order to assign them a DNF (rather than DNS). Note that the competitor must not be allowed to write information to identify the attempt at this point, so they must receive a DNF result.
Expand Down
9 changes: 5 additions & 4 deletions wca-regulations.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ Note: Because Article and Regulation numbers are not reassigned when Regulations
- A2c) After the scrambler starts scrambling the puzzle, the competitor must not see the puzzle until the inspection phase starts.
- A2c1) The scrambler places a cover over the scrambled puzzle that makes it impossible for any competitors or spectators to see any part of the puzzle. The cover remains over the puzzle until the start of the attempt.
- A2d) When taking a puzzle from the scrambler, the judge briefly inspects the puzzle to ensure thorough scrambling of the puzzle. The judge raises any concerns with the scrambler, who then conducts a detailed check.
- A2d1) The scrambler or an authorized judge must check the scrambled puzzle, and sign (or initial) the score sheet to affirm that they applied the correctly-numbered scramble sequence and checked that it matches the image (see [Regulation 4g](regulations:regulation:4g)). Exception: for 6x6x6 Cube, 7x7x7 Cube, and Megaminx the scrambler may sign (or initial) to affirm that the puzzle is sufficiently scrambled (see [Regulation 4g1](regulations:regulation:4g1)).
- A2d1) The scrambler or an authorized judge must check the scrambled puzzle, and sign the score sheet to affirm that they applied the correctly-numbered scramble sequence and checked that it matches the image (see [Regulation 4g](regulations:regulation:4g)). Exception: for 6x6x6 Cube, 7x7x7 Cube, and Megaminx the scrambler may sign to affirm that the puzzle is sufficiently scrambled (see [Regulation 4g1](regulations:regulation:4g1)). Scrambler signatures should be consistent throughout the competition and should identify the scrambler.
- A2e) The judge places the puzzle onto the mat in an arbitrary orientation while ensuring that it remains completely covered.
- A2e1) The competitor is not permitted to request a specific orientation, and the judge must not influence the orientation they place the puzzle on the mat based on what they know or expect the puzzle state to be.
- A2e2) The competitor must not remove the cover themselves. Penalty: disqualification of the attempt (DNF).
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -453,15 +453,16 @@ Note: Because Article and Regulation numbers are not reassigned when Regulations
- A7) Recording results:
- A7a) The judge tells the competitor the result.
- A7a1) The judge should indicate to the competitor that the puzzle is solved, or that a penalty will be applied.
- A7b) The judge records the result on a score sheet and signs next to the result to acknowledge that the result is correct, complete, properly formatted, and clearly readable.
- A7b) The judge records the result on a score sheet and signs next to the result to acknowledge that the result is correct, complete, properly formatted, and clearly readable. Judge signatures should be consistent throughout the competition and should identify the judge.
- A7b1) If penalties are assigned, the judge records the original recorded time displayed on the timer, along with any penalties. The format should be "T + X = F", where T represents the time displayed on the timer (the "original recorded time"), X represents a sum of time penalties during the attempt, and F represents the final result (e.g. 17.65 + 4 = 21.65).
- A7c) The competitor must check the recorded result, and sign (or initial) the score sheet to acknowledge that the result is correct, complete, properly formatted, and clearly readable. This finishes the attempt.
- A7c) The competitor must check the recorded result, and sign the score sheet to acknowledge that the result is correct, complete, properly formatted, and clearly readable. This finishes the attempt.
- A7c1) If the competitor or the judge refuses to accept and sign the score sheet, the WCA Delegate must resolve the dispute.
- A7c2) If the competitor intentionally signs (or otherwise marks) an attempt before they have begun it, they forfeit the attempt and the result will be considered DNS. Exception: for 3x3x3 Multi-Blind, the competitor may write the number of cubes they are attempting on the scorecard.
- A7c3) If the competitor signs (or otherwise marks) an attempt after starting the attempt but before the judge has finished recording the result, the attempt will be considered unfinished (DNF).
- A7c4) The competitor should not sign an attempt before the judge has recorded and signed the attempt. The competitor is ultimately responsible for ensuring that they and the judge have signed an attempt. If an attempt is found to be missing one or both signatures after the judge delivered the score sheet to the score taker (see [Regulation A7f](regulations:regulation:A7f)), it will be considered unfinished (DNF).
- A7c5) Missing signatures found before the end of the competition (see [Regulation 9u](regulations:regulation:9u)) may be added by the judge and/or the competitor, at the discretion of the WCA Delegate.
- A7c6) The competitor should not mark the score sheet anywhere other than in the area provided for them to sign.
- A7c6) Competitor signatures should be consistent throughout the competition and should identify the competitor. Competitors must not intentionally sign incorrectly. Penalty: disqualification of the attempt (DNF), at the discretion of the WCA Delegate.
- A7c7) The competitor should not mark the score sheet anywhere other than in the area provided for them to sign.
- A7f) When a competitor's score sheet for a round is complete, the judge delivers the score sheet to the score taker.
- A7g) At the discretion of the WCA Delegate, an incident or penalty caused by a competitor's inexperience may be replaced with an extra attempt.

Expand Down

0 comments on commit 7948c3b

Please sign in to comment.