You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
while creating new run, if the passed value of incremental repair flag is different from the existing value then it should allow to create new repair_unit instead of getting repair_unit based on cluster name/ keyspace /column combination.
so, if the full run was executed for the clustername/keyspace/column was executed earlier, not able to start new incremental run for the same combination. Reverse is also true.
So as per current solution if i delete the repair_unit then due to referential constraints i need to delete repair_segment and repair_run as well which will delete the run history corresponds to the repaid_unit.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Given the potential performance impact (run-time and per repair) of flipping to and from incremental, treating this as a completely new repair_unit seems reasonable to me.
while creating new run, if the passed value of incremental repair flag is different from the existing value then it should allow to create new repair_unit instead of getting repair_unit based on cluster name/ keyspace /column combination.
so, if the full run was executed for the clustername/keyspace/column was executed earlier, not able to start new incremental run for the same combination. Reverse is also true.
So as per current solution if i delete the repair_unit then due to referential constraints i need to delete repair_segment and repair_run as well which will delete the run history corresponds to the repaid_unit.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: