remove (object) in sage_docbuild

[fchapoton]

after that, there remains only

src/sage/misc/c3_controlled.pyx:class HierarchyElement(object, metaclass=ClasscallMetaclass):
src/sage/misc/classcall_metaclass.pyx:            sage: class FooNoInherits(object, metaclass=ClasscallMetaclass):
src/sage/misc/classcall_metaclass.pyx:            sage: class Foo2(object, metaclass=ClasscallMetaclass):
src/sage/misc/classcall_metaclass.pyx:            sage: class NOCALL(object, metaclass=ClasscallMetaclass):
src/sage/misc/classcall_metaclass.pyx:            sage: class Exc(object, metaclass=ClasscallMetaclass):
src/sage/misc/classcall_metaclass.pyx:class C2(object, metaclass=ClasscallMetaclass):
src/sage/misc/classcall_metaclass.pyx:class C3(object, metaclass = ClasscallMetaclass):
src/sage/misc/classcall_metaclass.pyx:class C2C(object, metaclass=ClasscallMetaclass):
src/sage/misc/classcall_metaclass.pyx:        sage: class PC(object, metaclass=ClasscallMetaclass):
src/sage/misc/nested_class.pyx:        sage: class ASuperClass(object, metaclass=NestedClassMetaclass):
src/sage/misc/nested_class.pyx:            sage: class A(object, metaclass=NestedClassMetaclass):
src/sage/misc/nested_class.pyx:class MainClass(object, metaclass=NestedClassMetaclass):

and

src/sage_setup/autogen/interpreters/generator.py:class InterpreterGenerator(object):
src/sage_setup/autogen/interpreters/instructions.py:class InstrSpec(object):
src/sage_setup/autogen/interpreters/memory.py:class MemoryChunk(object):
src/sage_setup/autogen/interpreters/specs/base.py:class InterpreterSpec(object):
src/sage_setup/autogen/interpreters/storage.py:class StorageType(object):

CC: @tscrim @slel @kliem @mkoeppe

Component: doctest framework

Author: Frédéric Chapoton

Branch/Commit: 16b8c4d

Reviewer: Kwankyu Lee, Travis Scrimshaw

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34366

[fchapoton]

Branch: u/chapoton/34366

[fchapoton]

New commits:

16b8c4d

remove inheritance of object in sage_docbuild

[fchapoton]

Commit: 16b8c4d

[kwankyu]

comment:3

Why not remove parentheses too?

[kwankyu]

comment:4

The doctest failure in sage/plot/plot.py seems genuine.

[fchapoton]

comment:5

the error in plot seems to be random and unrelated to the present ticket

[fchapoton]

comment:6

I think this should be good to go. The failure in plot is random, and have been seen elsewhere if I remember correctly.

[kwankyu]

comment:8

Why not remove parentheses too?

Would you answer this?

[fchapoton]

comment:9

Well, this is a matter of taste. I prefer to keep () for aesthetic reasons.

[kwankyu]

comment:10

Replying to @fchapoton:

Well, this is a matter of taste. I prefer to keep () for aesthetic reasons.

I doubt it. No parentheses indicate no inheritance. Dangling () looks just a mistake.

To see it as a matter of taste, there should be many examples in python docs or in sage.

[tscrim]

comment:11

There is no style guide on this AFAIK, so #34348 applies.

[kwankyu]

comment:12

Replying to @tscrim:

There is no style guide on this AFAIK, so #34348 applies.

Okay. Then I don't object.

[tscrim]

Reviewer: Kwankyu Lee, Travis Scrimshaw

[kwankyu]

comment:14

Replying to @tscrim:

so #34348 applies.

#34348 is to be explicit about disputed styles. If this issue is on dispute again somewhere else, we may consider to put it to the section.

[slel]

comment:15

Inheriting from other classes is

class This(That, Other):

so, to me, inheriting from no other class with

class This():

seems consistent.

Likewise, functions definitions and calls use parentheses,
whether or not there are arguments.

[vbraun]

Changed branch from u/chapoton/34366 to 16b8c4d