Format liballoc with rustfmt #66890
Merged
Format liballoc with rustfmt #66890
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 1c4d453 has been approved by |
|
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 1000, this pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Centril
added a commit
to Centril/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2019
Format liballoc with rustfmt Same strategy as rust-lang#66691 -- as with my previous formatting PRs, I am avoiding causing merge conflicts in other PRs by only touches those files that are not involved in any currently open PR. Files that appear in new PRs between when this PR is opened and when it makes it to the top of the bors queue will be reverted from this PR. The list of files involved in open PRs is determined by querying GitHub's GraphQL API [with this script](https://gist.github.com/dtolnay/aa9c34993dc051a4f344d1b10e4487e8). With the list of files from the script in outstanding_files, the relevant commands were: ``` $ find src/liballoc -name '*.rs' \ | xargs rustfmt --edition=2018 --unstable-features --skip-children $ rg liballoc outstanding_files | xargs git checkout -- ``` To confirm no funny business: ``` $ git checkout $THIS_COMMIT^ $ git show --pretty= --name-only $THIS_COMMIT \ | xargs rustfmt --edition=2018 --unstable-features --skip-children $ git diff $THIS_COMMIT # there should be no difference ``` r? @Dylan-DPC
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 1, 2019
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - #66503 (More useful test error messages on should_panic(expected=...) mismatch) - #66662 (Miri: run panic-catching tests in liballoc) - #66679 (Improve lifetime errors with implicit trait object lifetimes) - #66726 (Use recursion_limit for const eval stack limit) - #66790 (Do `min_const_fn` checks for `SetDiscriminant`s target) - #66832 (const_prop: detect and avoid catching Miri errors that require allocation) - #66880 (Add long error code explanation message for E0203) - #66890 (Format liballoc with rustfmt) - #66896 (pass Queries to compiler callbacks) Failed merges: r? @ghost
dtolnay
added
T-libs
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Same strategy as #66691 -- as with my previous formatting PRs, I am avoiding causing merge conflicts in other PRs by only touches those files that are not involved in any currently open PR. Files that appear in new PRs between when this PR is opened and when it makes it to the top of the bors queue will be reverted from this PR.
The list of files involved in open PRs is determined by querying GitHub's GraphQL API with this script.
With the list of files from the script in outstanding_files, the relevant commands were:
To confirm no funny business:
r? @Dylan-DPC