-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve type hints in tv_tensor.wrap #8830
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/vision/8830
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
Hi @twsl! Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. Action RequiredIn order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you. ProcessIn order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA. Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at cla@meta.com. Thanks! |
Fix would also be included in #8817 |
Sorry folks, I don't think I can merge this. Mypy is painful enough to please (and I'll probably have to disable it entirely anyway), but I just really don't have any bandwidth to support all type-checkers out there :/ |
Is there a recommended/official torchvision stubs project ? Because type checking python is crucial to my applications. |
There is none, sorry |
By the way, why is the type var restricted using positional arguments instead of using a |
I intended to make the typehints explicit. Yet your comment actually made me rethink the implementation. But to actually return the correct type, it would need |
Fix #8829