Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Introduce FunctionDefinition node, use it in generate_tests #2522

Closed
RonnyPfannschmidt opened this issue Jun 23, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Introduce FunctionDefinition node, use it in generate_tests #2522

RonnyPfannschmidt opened this issue Jun 23, 2017 · 2 comments
Labels
topic: collection related to the collection phase topic: marks related to marks, either the general marks or builtin type: backward compatibility might present some backward compatibility issues which should be carefully noted in the changelog type: enhancement new feature or API change, should be merged into features branch type: feature-branch new feature or API change, should be merged into features branch

Comments

@RonnyPfannschmidt
Copy link
Member

the function definition will be a real node with node apis, getting rid of much of the pain with metafunc
@RonnyPfannschmidt RonnyPfannschmidt added type: backward compatibility might present some backward compatibility issues which should be carefully noted in the changelog topic: collection related to the collection phase type: feature-branch new feature or API change, should be merged into features branch topic: marks related to marks, either the general marks or builtin labels Jun 23, 2017
@RonnyPfannschmidt
Copy link
Member Author

this superseedes #1425

This was referenced Jun 23, 2017
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
@RonnyPfannschmidt RonnyPfannschmidt mentioned this issue Jun 30, 2017
Closed
@RonnyPfannschmidt RonnyPfannschmidt mentioned this issue Jul 28, 2017
Closed
@nicoddemus nicoddemus added type: enhancement new feature or API change, should be merged into features branch and removed type: enhancement new feature or API change, should be merged into features branch labels Sep 14, 2017
@RonnyPfannschmidt
Copy link
Member Author

fixed in #3317

@Zac-HD Zac-HD mentioned this issue Oct 21, 2018
Open
@blakeNaccarato blakeNaccarato mentioned this issue Oct 23, 2023
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
topic: collection related to the collection phase topic: marks related to marks, either the general marks or builtin type: backward compatibility might present some backward compatibility issues which should be carefully noted in the changelog type: enhancement new feature or API change, should be merged into features branch type: feature-branch new feature or API change, should be merged into features branch
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@RonnyPfannschmidt @nicoddemus