Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prysm unable to provide expired blob even when configured to #13853

Closed
parithosh opened this issue Apr 5, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #13869
Closed

Prysm unable to provide expired blob even when configured to #13853

parithosh opened this issue Apr 5, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #13869
Assignees
Labels
API Api related tasks Bug Something isn't working

Comments

@parithosh
Copy link

Describe the bug

A prysm node was setup pre-dencun mainnet fork with the flag "--blob-retention-epochs=300000000",. This should in theory configure the node to store blobs beyond the expiry window.

The API call curl localhost:5052/eth/v1/beacon/blob_sidecars/8626178 queries the first slot with a blob. This call worked fine inside the blob expiry window.

The same call now returns {"data":[]}, indicated the blob can't be read via the API beyond the expiry window. The call was also checked against a lighthouse node with a similar configuration and it indeed returns the blob as expected.

The DB size however hasn't reduced and is continuing to increase:
37G mainnet_archive_blob_storage_prysm_nethermind_001, so its indicative of the blob being present but unable to be retrieved via the API.

Has this worked before in a previous version?

n/a

🔬 Minimal Reproduction

Query a node that has been configured to store blobs forever (theoretically)

Error

n/a

Platform(s)

Linux (x86)

What version of Prysm are you running? (Which release)

v5.0.3

Anything else relevant (validator index / public key)?

No response

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
API Api related tasks Bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants