Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(Feature) POA solidity-flattener instead of Python solidity flattener #194

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 21, 2018

Conversation

vbaranov
Copy link
Collaborator

In order to simplify the setup of POA governance smart contracts, the proposal is to replace Python solidity flattener with POA solidity-flattener. It has no known vulnerabilities.

What does the simplification include:

  • no need Python as a prerequisite
  • no need solc binary a prerequisite (we have it as an npm package)
  • no need to install Python solidity-flattener additionally (everything is installed from npm install)

@vbaranov vbaranov requested a review from varasev September 21, 2018 09:49
make_flat.sh Outdated
@@ -1,20 +1,20 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash

#pip3 install solidity-flattener --no-cache-dir -U
#pip3 install poa-solidity-flattener --no-cache-dir -U
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe remove these comments at all?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, will do

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@varasev done

@vbaranov vbaranov merged commit 7da7c33 into master Sep 21, 2018
@vbaranov vbaranov deleted the POA-solidity-flattener branch September 21, 2018 12:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants