Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Local user mentioned instead of remote user when username is same #2421

Closed
dadall opened this issue Oct 10, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

Local user mentioned instead of remote user when username is same #2421

dadall opened this issue Oct 10, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
🕸️ ActivityPub Federation-related issue 🧠 Backend Related to server logic and execution
Milestone
0.13.0 - Federati...

Comments

@dadall
Copy link

dadall commented Oct 10, 2020

Hey there,

Here you can see a post where I reply to a user from Mastodon with my PF account.
This user has an account on my instance - https://pix.diaspodon.fr/gegeweb - and a Mastodon account - https://stoneartprod.xyz/@gegeweb - both with the same name.

I guess PF do not check this kind of configuration so the mistake happens ?
@trwnh trwnh added the 🐛 Bug label Oct 28, 2020
@trwnh trwnh changed the title Wrong account mentionned in reply Local user mentioned instead of remote user when username is same Oct 28, 2020
@trwnh trwnh added 🕸️ ActivityPub Federation-related issue 🧠 Backend Related to server logic and execution labels Oct 28, 2020
@trwnh trwnh added this to the 0.11.0 - Circles Update milestone Oct 28, 2020
@dansup dansup closed this as completed in dac0608 Dec 1, 2020
@trwnh trwnh added this to x May 31, 2024
@trwnh trwnh moved this to Done in x May 31, 2024
@trwnh trwnh removed this from x Jun 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
🕸️ ActivityPub Federation-related issue 🧠 Backend Related to server logic and execution
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.13.0 - Federation Update
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@dadall @trwnh