Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOC] Add strict_allow_templates option for the dynamic mapping parameter #7676

Closed
1 of 4 tasks
gaobinlong opened this issue Jul 11, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #7745
Closed
1 of 4 tasks

[DOC] Add strict_allow_templates option for the dynamic mapping parameter #7676

gaobinlong opened this issue Jul 11, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #7745
Assignees
Labels
3 - Done Issue is done/complete v2.16.0

Comments

@gaobinlong
Copy link
Contributor

gaobinlong commented Jul 11, 2024

What do you want to do?

  • Request a change to existing documentation
  • Add new documentation
  • Report a technical problem with the documentation
  • Other

Tell us about your request. Provide a summary of the request.

In this PR, we introduce a new option strict_allow_templates for the dynamic mapping parameter, we need to document the usage.

*Version: List the OpenSearch version to which this issue applies, e.g. 2.14, 2.12--2.14, or all.

2.16.0

What other resources are available? Provide links to related issues, POCs, steps for testing, etc.

@hdhalter hdhalter added 1 - Backlog - DEV Developer assigned to issue is responsible for creating PR. v2.16.0 labels Jul 11, 2024
@hdhalter hdhalter added 2 - In progress Issue/PR: The issue or PR is in progress. and removed 1 - Backlog - DEV Developer assigned to issue is responsible for creating PR. labels Jul 17, 2024
@hdhalter hdhalter added 3 - Done Issue is done/complete and removed 2 - In progress Issue/PR: The issue or PR is in progress. labels Jul 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3 - Done Issue is done/complete v2.16.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants