Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

unable to run test_verify_bls_signature #2

Open
stefan-nikolov96 opened this issue Oct 31, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

unable to run test_verify_bls_signature #2

stefan-nikolov96 opened this issue Oct 31, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@stefan-nikolov96
Copy link

I am unable to run test_verify_bls_signature() with over 256GiB in RAM and just as much in swap memory. I get a memory overflow and then the program recieves a SIGKILL signal from the OS.

I tried running nargo compile in debug and release mode and with 0.9.0 and 0.15.0 compiler versions.

GDB shows that the nargo overflows in the compiler frontend. On a machine with 64GiB RAM, it uses about 50GiB during inlining and the program fails during mem2reg
https://github.com/noir-lang/noir/blob/master/compiler/noirc_evaluator/src/ssa/opt/mem2reg.rs

Since @onurinanc commented that this test runs on a 16GiB machine, can you rerun it and verify it still works and specify any additional compiler flags or steps you take before running nargo compile?

@onurinanc
Copy link
Owner

@stefan-nikolov96 Thank you for the issue that you created. I'm also having the same issue with the 16GiB machine. I'll create an issue about this in Noir-lang repository

@stefan-nikolov96
Copy link
Author

@onurinanc Thanks for the quick response. Do you remember which release you used, so I can test on that version of noir while this gets resolved?

@onurinanc
Copy link
Owner

@stefan-nikolov96 I compiled it with the version 0.9.0. However, I am having the same issue also in that version. I benchmarked it without totally compiled. (so, it won't work also for you, but you may try to approximate the proving time using the same method I used below)

I reduced the loop count in the miller loop an benchmark it, for example, for i in 0..2 -> 30 minutes, for i in 0..8, for i in 0..10, for i in 0..12, and have an approximate benchmark for this. Also, I use the similar technique while benchmarking the final_exponentiation circuit.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants