Link to FAIRSharing metrics

[dgarijo]

They are ingesting some of our tests. I would like to explicitly state that some of our metrics have equivalents in fairsharing.
We need to figure out how to do this.

[allysonlister]

I am happy to start making some records, but we need to decide on OSTrails/FAIR_assessment_output_specification#34 before I can. I see there have not been any additional comments after I created the ticket, I will ping people on there and we can hopefully talk about it at one of the meetings we have for OSTrails this week. Thanks!

[allysonlister]

(Note that records in FAIRsharing are not the things themselves, but descriptions of the thing. So a metric record in FAIRsharing describes one of @dgarijo's metrics, but is not equivalent to it). However I, too, wish to start explicitly linking metrics in FAIRsharing with @dgarijo's metrics, so let's get to it!

In the interests of getting this moving, I have used the consensus so far in the hierarchy ticket mentioned above to start creating records; modifications can be made to all FAIR principles, metrics and benchmarks records in FAIRsharing if final decisions vary from what is already there. I have marked the records in FAIRsharing as 'in development' to prevent the creation of DOIs until we're happy.

Note that I have updated and extended the mapping between FOOPS! metrics and FAIRsharing metrics records within our sharepoint document. We need to address the outstanding issues within this mapping in order to progress to automated pushing/pulling of metrics records into FAIRsharing.

Here's a small snippet of the FAIR principles together with two example metrics, with metadata taken according to conversations within OSTrails and with GO-FAIR (via Erik Schultes) to ensure community consensus around how principles are represented in FAIRsharing.

• FAIR Principles - Findable (Abbreviation FAIR - F) - https://fairsharing.org/6269
  • FAIR Principles F1: (Meta)data are assigned globally unique and persistent identifiers (Abbreviation: FAIR F1). https://fairsharing.org/6273 Note: If a test ran this as a compound principle, but the code failed on one, we wouldn't know which one it would fail on. Further the actual implemented tests for globally unique and persistent would quite often be different. Therefore these have been separated into sub-principles.
    • FAIR Principles F1-GUID: (Meta)data are assigned globally unique identifiers (Abbreviation: FAIR F1-GUID) https://fairsharing.org/6274
      • FAIR Metric - Consistent Ontology IDs (https://fairsharing.org/6288)
    • FAIR Principles F1-PID: (Meta)data are assigned persistent identifiers (Abbreviation: FAIR F1-PID) https://fairsharing.org/6275
      • FAIR Metric - Persistent URL (https://fairsharing.org/6289)
  • FAIR Principles F2: Data are described with rich metadata (Abbreviation: FAIR F2) https://fairsharing.org/6276
  • FAIR Principles F3: Metadata clearly and explicitly include the identifier of the data they describe (Abbreviation: FAIR F3) https://fairsharing.org/6277
  • FAIR Principles F4: (meta)data are registered or indexed in a searchable resource: https://fairsharing.org/6278

Outstanding questions:

1. consensus on mapping of metrics (see onedrive link above)
2. final FAIR hierarchy discussion and resolution of FAIR Principles Hierarchy - discussion requested OSTrails/FAIR_assessment_output_specification#34
3. How to link out to tests related to a metric from a FAIRsharing metrics record.

What do you think so far? Happy to talk about this during this week, as I am NOT attending the GA in person.

Referencing @knirirr for his information.

[dgarijo]

Thanks @allysonlister.
Let me have a look at the issues and come back to you. I am sad to hear you won't be at the GAM :(

[allysonlister]

I wish I could go @dgarijo but I have various family appointments and events that cannot be postponed, otherwise I would have enjoyed attending and seeing you and everyone in person. @knirirr and Susanna will be there.

Thanks!