You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The dropoff for each filter should go almost vertically down after the filter cutoff <-- this is not happening
Try the trial examples w GCM filters in the notebook link Dhruv sent --> apply what you learned to fix my graphs
Use whiteboard pic to derive power spectra units w/ xrft
Image in GCM filters documentation plots the filter kernel, not the filter cutoff like I thought
Play with the GCM theory notebook in documentation --> plot the filter cutoff on a log scale
air-sea flux anomalies --> don't use imshow
plot with lat-lon axes
the current plots are a mirror image of the earth
plot for some specific regions, not just the whole earth (e.g. gulf stream region, eastern pacific region off west coast of south america, 1000 x 1000 km)
narrow in on the colobar scale for freshwater flux (e.g. use plt.plot, robust=True)
make movies of the flux anomalies
Super-res project:
custom alpha loss:
dig into every single line in CNN code + custom loss function w/ alpha and training loop and understand why it works
minimum working example: try custom loss function alpha with a dummy MSE loss implementation + very simple data to try to debug (e.g. linear regression) --> this allows us to isolate the loss issue, and not get mixed into the CNN issues
fft loss:
document what happens when only fft MSE is in loss func (no real space MSE)
determine whether we need MSE for magnitude and phase or not
Overleaf:
add board pics from last 3 meetings
document results of each experiment
Paper:
describe tianyi li et al paper to dhruv --> make a short ppt (45 mins ppt)
Diagnostics project:
Super-res project:
custom alpha loss:
fft loss:
Overleaf:
Paper:
Group meeting:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: