-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
UX: Improve the help doc and output for verification #304
Comments
|
My proposal @priteshbandi @dtzar @iamsamirzon @binbin-li @patrickzheng200 @shizhMSFT @gokarnm @vaninrao10 , I will create PR to update spec
|
@yizha1 It looks better than before. I suggest updating I have a few questions:
|
|
@yizha1 Reply to 2, if |
@FeynmanZhou - The use cases for --debug are documented here. #300 I don't think we need to display into HTTP request headers etc as those can be captured by a Wireshark TCP/IP capture tool as well. |
Looks good! Side related issue - it'd be really great if there was some way to parse the output from the responses. i.e. so someone who does |
11/17: Create new issue for sign and verify output, specially when signing and verifying with tag. |
Reopened because the implementation of this issue (#450) is not merged yet. |
Summary
Currently only a digest showed as the output after notation verify successfully executed. What is this digest about: the digest of the signature, signature manifest or image manifest? see example below:
Currently the digest from the output is actually the digest of image manifest.
The help doc for notation verify is not accurate as well. Currently it is showed as below:
It is actually to verify the signature of an OCI artifact, not SBOM, VA or any other supply chain artifacts.
User Scenario
As a user, after I verify a signature of the supplied image or OCI artifact against the certificate successfully, I want to make sure the verification is performed on the correct image or OCI artifact against correct certificate.
Improvement
Here is one idea of improving the output after a successful verification.
NOTE: Maybe need to consider the case of multiple signatures against the same certificate.
cc @shizhMSFT @dtzar @FeynmanZhou @SteveLasker
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: