Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dependency Error AspectJ Maven Plugin Installation For com:sun:tools:jar #16

Closed
ihsanhaikalz opened this issue Jun 23, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

@ihsanhaikalz
Copy link

I would like to run the Maven project that I have on https://github.com/ihsanhaikalz/testMaven in the Eclipse 4.5 (Mars) but it gave me an error in the pom.xml as follow:

1 problem was encountered while building the effective model for
org.codehaus.mojo:aspectj-maven-plugin:1.8 [ERROR]
'dependencies.dependency.systemPath' for com.sun:tools:jar must specify an
absolute path but is ${toolsjarSystemPath} @

I already installed AJDT for Eclipse 4.5 through http://download.eclipse.org/tools/ajdt/45/dev/update and when I pulled from my github the Eclipse started to download Maven plugin connectors and Maven integration for AJDT but the error is still there. For the complete question please refer to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/37994466/dependency-error-aspectj-maven-plugin-installation-for-comsuntoolsjar

@kriegaex
Copy link
Collaborator

I am also affected by this problem and think I just fixed it in my pull request. Would you consider releasing 1.9 soon or maybe cherry-pick my small commit onto 1.8 and push a bugfix release?

@davidkarlsen
Copy link
Member

@kriegaex I just deployed 1.9-SNAPSHOT.
Please give it a spin and if it works out I'll release.

@kriegaex
Copy link
Collaborator

As I wrote weeks ago in #18, it works now. Why don't you release?

@davidkarlsen
Copy link
Member

Sorry for the day - rolled a vote now: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mojohaus-dev/ssI-k8lx6N4

@davidkarlsen
Copy link
Member

In central now!

@kriegaex
Copy link
Collaborator

kriegaex commented Dec 4, 2016

Thank you very much. I just tried 1.9 and - as expected - it works.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants