From 379d2e0c8ae1517e9c52e7a6bbece6f2cb1d9e86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Guteniev Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2024 10:43:50 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Unskip libcxx sized deallocations test --- tests/libcxx/expected_results.txt | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/libcxx/expected_results.txt b/tests/libcxx/expected_results.txt index a9bab3c4f5..bc2c9d1a09 100644 --- a/tests/libcxx/expected_results.txt +++ b/tests/libcxx/expected_results.txt @@ -368,12 +368,6 @@ std/utilities/meta/meta.unary/meta.unary.prop/has_unique_object_representations. # *** CLANG ISSUES, NOT YET ANALYZED *** -# Clang doesn't enable sized deallocation by default. Should we add -fsized-deallocation or do something else? -std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/sized_delete_array_fsizeddeallocation.pass.cpp:2 SKIPPED -std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/sized_delete_array14.pass.cpp:2 SKIPPED -std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/sized_delete_fsizeddeallocation.pass.cpp:2 SKIPPED -std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/sized_delete14.pass.cpp:2 SKIPPED - # Not analyzed. Clang apparently defines platform macros differently from C1XX. std/language.support/support.limits/limits/numeric.limits.members/traps.pass.cpp:2 FAIL