-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 778
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix change facility workflow #13165
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Fix change facility workflow #13165
Conversation
Build Artifacts
|
Habemus facility change and account merging again, hallelujah!!! 🎉 🎉 🎉 I also went through the LoD setup with account on server (import and new), just for kicks, and still all good 💯 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! 💯 👏🏽
@radinamatic does this mean that Alex's work here has fixed the (neglected) work in progress I had for one of the previous alpha releases, or that's still separately a problem? #13097 It seems the same root cause (composition api changes in the code syntax) but perhaps just he has actually found all of the places where the problems were |
Summary
After the vue upgrade to vue 2.7, this
state
computed property that was the context of the state machine provided by theChangeFacility
index component had a change: When we refer to this injected property from the setup method, we need to access it through the.value
property, but when we access it through the options api we dont need the.value
property anymore. This basically caused the entire change facility workflow to break.In the course of that refactor I somehow fixed the underlying issue that was causing #12762 (that wasnt initially caused by the vue upgrade since it was reported before that).
Compartir.pantalla.-.2025-03-06.14_04_34.mp4
References
Closes #12762
Reviewer guidance
Note
state
injected prop in the whole ChangeFacility folder, and validated that all references to it inside thesetup
method was being referenced with the.value
property, and all the references outside thesetup
method was being referenced without the.value
property. But a double check never hurts :)