Try to be more subtle when inferring type parameters of class parents #16896
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The previous scheme was basically like this:
It could happen in the second case that we infer Nothing since an expected type was missing, but if the parent type had been an application, we would have inferred something else from implicit arguments to the parent constructor. This is a case handled by Scala 2, but not yet by Dotty.
To deal with this we have to perform a complicated dance:
I normally would have thought this is too much sophistry but there are valid use cases that Scala 2 supports and it would be good if we get to parity for these.
Fixes #16778