Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update our dependency on K8s libs to 1.15.3 #5570

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2019

Conversation

mattmoor
Copy link
Member

With a minimum K8s version of 1.14 (starting in 0.10), 1.15.3 puts us in the center of the +/-1 version window of support.

/hold

This depends on a number of upstream PRs to land, including in the K8s incubator.

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 17, 2019
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. label Sep 17, 2019
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added area/API API objects and controllers size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. area/autoscale area/networking area/test-and-release It flags unit/e2e/conformance/perf test issues for product features labels Sep 17, 2019
@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mattmoor

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 17, 2019
@@ -63,7 +63,8 @@ func NewMetricProvider(metricClient MetricClient) *MetricProvider {
}

// GetMetricByName implements the interface.
func (p *MetricProvider) GetMetricByName(name types.NamespacedName, info provider.CustomMetricInfo) (*cmetrics.MetricValue, error) {
func (p *MetricProvider) GetMetricByName(name types.NamespacedName, info provider.CustomMetricInfo,
metricSelector labels.Selector) (*cmetrics.MetricValue, error) {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cc @markusthoemmes

LMK what the best way to incorporate this would be?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've looked through the upstream changes and it seems absolutely fine for us to just not implement it at all right now.

Copy link
Contributor

@mattmoor-sockpuppet mattmoor-sockpuppet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Found go linting violations, please merge: mattmoor#100

@mattmoor mattmoor force-pushed the update-client-go branch 2 times, most recently from 5e0b033 to 3857f1e Compare September 17, 2019 21:21
@mattmoor mattmoor force-pushed the update-client-go branch 2 times, most recently from 32fda97 to 1595bcb Compare September 18, 2019 17:46
@mattmoor
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-knative-serving-integration-tests

@vagababov
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 18, 2019
@mattmoor
Copy link
Member Author

This needs the change from @JRBANCEL to land first

@knative-test-reporter-robot

The following jobs failed due to test flakiness:

Test name Triggers Retries
pull-knative-serving-integration-tests 0/3

Failed non-flaky tests preventing automatic retry of pull-knative-serving-integration-tests:

test/scale.[build failed]
test/conformance/api/v1.[build failed]
test/conformance/api/v1alpha1.[build failed]
test/conformance/api/v1beta1.[build failed]
test/conformance/runtime.[build failed]
test/e2e.[build failed]

With a minimum K8s version of 1.14 (starting in 0.10), 1.15.3 puts us in the center of the +/-1 version window of support.

/hold

This depends on a number of upstream PRs to land, including in the K8s incubator.
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 18, 2019
@vagababov
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 18, 2019
@knative-metrics-robot
Copy link

The following is the coverage report on pkg/.
Say /test pull-knative-serving-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/reconciler/reconciler.go 75.0% 87.5% 12.5

@mattmoor
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 18, 2019
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot merged commit 9463ee1 into knative:master Sep 18, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/API API objects and controllers area/autoscale area/networking area/test-and-release It flags unit/e2e/conformance/perf test issues for product features cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants