Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust metric creation to be akin to other reconciled entities. #4895

Merged

Conversation

markusthoemmes
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed Changes

  • Adjust the reconcile method to act as if the reconciliation was actually backed by an API. It needs to base the update entity on the actual entity it got earlier to be able to successfully update once we have the Metric entities backed by an API.
  • Adjust the Metric's metadata to only pick the needed values from PA's metadata. resourceVersion and friends are not to be copied over. Also add an owner reference.

Release Note

NONE

/assign @vagababov

- Adjust the reconcile method to act as if the reconciliation was actually backed by an API. It needs to base the update entity on the actual entity it got earlier to be able to successfully update once we have the Metric entities backed by an API.
- Adjust the Metric's metadata to only pick the needed values from PA's metadata. resourceVersion and friends are not to be copied over. Also add an owner reference.
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. label Jul 23, 2019
@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. area/API API objects and controllers area/autoscale labels Jul 23, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@markusthoemmes: 0 warnings.

In response to this:

Proposed Changes

  • Adjust the reconcile method to act as if the reconciliation was actually backed by an API. It needs to base the update entity on the actual entity it got earlier to be able to successfully update once we have the Metric entities backed by an API.
  • Adjust the Metric's metadata to only pick the needed values from PA's metadata. resourceVersion and friends are not to be copied over. Also add an owner reference.

Release Note

NONE

/assign @vagababov

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@knative-prow-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: markusthoemmes

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 23, 2019
@@ -175,19 +175,21 @@ func (c *Base) ReconcileMetric(ctx context.Context, pa *pav1alpha1.PodAutoscaler
desiredMetric := resources.MakeMetric(ctx, pa, metricSN, config.FromContext(ctx).Autoscaler)
metric, err := c.Metrics.Get(ctx, desiredMetric.Namespace, desiredMetric.Name)
if errors.IsNotFound(err) {
metric, err = c.Metrics.Create(ctx, desiredMetric)
_, err = c.Metrics.Create(ctx, desiredMetric)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why this change?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Because the variable is used nowere after moving the else block in.

Copy link
Contributor

@vagababov vagababov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

want := metric.DeepCopy()
want.Spec = desiredMetric.Spec
if _, err = c.Metrics.Update(ctx, desiredMetric); err != nil {
return perrors.Wrap(err, "error updating metric")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just envisioning: fmt.Errorf("error updating metric: %w", err)
😆

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 23, 2019
@markusthoemmes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-knative-serving-integration-tests

Weird error.

@knative-prow-robot knative-prow-robot merged commit 07361fe into knative:master Jul 23, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/API API objects and controllers area/autoscale cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants