Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Enhancement]: Add support for Image Scanning Configuration to aws_imagebuilder_image_pipeline resource #31597

Closed
marlonparmentier opened this issue May 26, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #33005
Labels
enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. service/imagebuilder Issues and PRs that pertain to the imagebuilder service.
Milestone

Comments

@marlonparmentier
Copy link

marlonparmentier commented May 26, 2023

Description

Currently there is no support for image scanning configuration in the aws_imagebuilder_image_pipeline resource. This means there is no way to enable image scanning in the imagebuilder pipeline without resorting to something outside of the terraform Resource. I would like to be able to enable this on any deployed EC2 ImageBuilder pipeline from the Terraform resource. The AWS CLI already has support for this function for example.

Affected Resource(s) and/or Data Source(s)

aws_imagebuilder_image_pipeline

Potential Terraform Configuration

image_scanning_configuration_enabled = true

References

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/aws-properties-imagebuilder-imagepipeline-imagescanningconfiguration.html
https://awscli.amazonaws.com/v2/documentation/api/latest/reference/imagebuilder/update-image-pipeline.html#:~:text=%2D%2Dimage%2Dscanning%2Dconfiguration%20(structure)

Would you like to implement a fix?

None

@marlonparmentier marlonparmentier added enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. labels May 26, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

Community Note

Voting for Prioritization

  • Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original post to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request.
  • Please see our prioritization guide for information on how we prioritize.
  • Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.

Volunteering to Work on This Issue

  • If you are interested in working on this issue, please leave a comment.
  • If this would be your first contribution, please review the contribution guide.

@justinretzolk justinretzolk added service/imagebuilder Issues and PRs that pertain to the imagebuilder service. and removed needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. labels May 26, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v5.13.0 milestone Aug 16, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

This functionality has been released in v5.13.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 18, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. service/imagebuilder Issues and PRs that pertain to the imagebuilder service.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants