Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(ethexe): add support for FROST signatures to sequencer & validator #4515

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

StackOverflowExcept1on
Copy link
Member

@StackOverflowExcept1on StackOverflowExcept1on commented Feb 17, 2025

This PR adds support for FROST threshold signatures, which require only $\approx 10500$ gas to validate on Ethereum, allowing us to spend 30-40x less gas on large validator set.

@StackOverflowExcept1on StackOverflowExcept1on added the A0-pleasereview PR is ready to be reviewed by the team label Feb 17, 2025
Copy link
Member

@grishasobol grishasobol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we have test which tests this for incorrect validators?

Comment on lines +275 to +277
uint256 _signatureRX,
uint256 _signatureRY,
uint256 _signatureZ
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we concat this in one structure?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

make sense

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wdym by incorrect validatos? you mean malicious validators?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A0-pleasereview PR is ready to be reviewed by the team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants