Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Suggestion] Use only MIT license #266

Closed
rprata opened this issue Sep 21, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

[Suggestion] Use only MIT license #266

rprata opened this issue Sep 21, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@rprata
Copy link

rprata commented Sep 21, 2017

Hi,
I check your project, but I am confused about the license. Why that you use GPLv2 for this project? Is it not better to keep only MIT License, according your text license description?

Best regards,

@pinty
Copy link

pinty commented Oct 3, 2017

As I understand from the license text, this project is dual licensed under GPLv2 / MIT. You can chose from those two which one suits you the most.
Can the author confirm this?
Thank you!

@faisalman
Copy link
Owner

@rprata as the original author, I simply want to give more flexibility for people who want use this work, either under a restrictive license (GPL) or a permissive one (MIT). Thus, as pointed by @pinty it's dual-licensed under GPLv2 / MIT. Feel free to choose which one you might prefer.

Related: #1

@rprata
Copy link
Author

rprata commented Oct 11, 2017

Ok, thank you for the answer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants