Skip to content

Commit 34205d8

Browse files
committed
update snapshot
1 parent 37a3003 commit 34205d8

File tree

1 file changed

+159
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+159
-0
lines changed
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
1+
# report.brms
2+
3+
Code
4+
report(model, verbose = FALSE)
5+
Message
6+
Start sampling
7+
Chain 1 Informational Message: The current Metropolis proposal is about to be rejected because of the following issue:
8+
Chain 1 Exception: normal_id_glm_lpdf: Scale vector is 0, but must be positive finite! (in 'C:/Users/DL/AppData/Local/Temp/RtmpERRA9z/model-12d437f47a61.stan', line 35, column 4 to column 62)
9+
Chain 1 If this warning occurs sporadically, such as for highly constrained variable types like covariance matrices, then the sampler is fine,
10+
Chain 1 but if this warning occurs often then your model may be either severely ill-conditioned or misspecified.
11+
Chain 1
12+
Chain 2 Informational Message: The current Metropolis proposal is about to be rejected because of the following issue:
13+
Chain 2 Exception: normal_id_glm_lpdf: Scale vector is inf, but must be positive finite! (in 'C:/Users/DL/AppData/Local/Temp/RtmpERRA9z/model-12d437f47a61.stan', line 35, column 4 to column 62)
14+
Chain 2 If this warning occurs sporadically, such as for highly constrained variable types like covariance matrices, then the sampler is fine,
15+
Chain 2 but if this warning occurs often then your model may be either severely ill-conditioned or misspecified.
16+
Chain 2
17+
Chain 2 Informational Message: The current Metropolis proposal is about to be rejected because of the following issue:
18+
Chain 2 Exception: normal_id_glm_lpdf: Scale vector is inf, but must be positive finite! (in 'C:/Users/DL/AppData/Local/Temp/RtmpERRA9z/model-12d437f47a61.stan', line 35, column 4 to column 62)
19+
Chain 2 If this warning occurs sporadically, such as for highly constrained variable types like covariance matrices, then the sampler is fine,
20+
Chain 2 but if this warning occurs often then your model may be either severely ill-conditioned or misspecified.
21+
Chain 2
22+
Chain 3 Informational Message: The current Metropolis proposal is about to be rejected because of the following issue:
23+
Chain 3 Exception: normal_id_glm_lpdf: Scale vector is inf, but must be positive finite! (in 'C:/Users/DL/AppData/Local/Temp/RtmpERRA9z/model-12d437f47a61.stan', line 35, column 4 to column 62)
24+
Chain 3 If this warning occurs sporadically, such as for highly constrained variable types like covariance matrices, then the sampler is fine,
25+
Chain 3 but if this warning occurs often then your model may be either severely ill-conditioned or misspecified.
26+
Chain 3
27+
Chain 3 Informational Message: The current Metropolis proposal is about to be rejected because of the following issue:
28+
Chain 3 Exception: normal_id_glm_lpdf: Scale vector is inf, but must be positive finite! (in 'C:/Users/DL/AppData/Local/Temp/RtmpERRA9z/model-12d437f47a61.stan', line 35, column 4 to column 62)
29+
Chain 3 If this warning occurs sporadically, such as for highly constrained variable types like covariance matrices, then the sampler is fine,
30+
Chain 3 but if this warning occurs often then your model may be either severely ill-conditioned or misspecified.
31+
Chain 3
32+
Chain 3 Informational Message: The current Metropolis proposal is about to be rejected because of the following issue:
33+
Chain 3 Exception: normal_id_glm_lpdf: Scale vector is inf, but must be positive finite! (in 'C:/Users/DL/AppData/Local/Temp/RtmpERRA9z/model-12d437f47a61.stan', line 35, column 4 to column 62)
34+
Chain 3 If this warning occurs sporadically, such as for highly constrained variable types like covariance matrices, then the sampler is fine,
35+
Chain 3 but if this warning occurs often then your model may be either severely ill-conditioned or misspecified.
36+
Chain 3
37+
Chain 3 Informational Message: The current Metropolis proposal is about to be rejected because of the following issue:
38+
Chain 3 Exception: normal_id_glm_lpdf: Scale vector is inf, but must be positive finite! (in 'C:/Users/DL/AppData/Local/Temp/RtmpERRA9z/model-12d437f47a61.stan', line 35, column 4 to column 62)
39+
Chain 3 If this warning occurs sporadically, such as for highly constrained variable types like covariance matrices, then the sampler is fine,
40+
Chain 3 but if this warning occurs often then your model may be either severely ill-conditioned or misspecified.
41+
Chain 3
42+
Output
43+
We fitted a Bayesian linear model (estimated using MCMC sampling with 4 chains
44+
of 300 iterations and a warmup of 150) to predict mpg with qsec and wt
45+
(formula: mpg ~ qsec + wt). Priors over parameters were set as student_t
46+
(location = 19.20, scale = 5.40) distributions. The model's explanatory power
47+
is substantial (R2 = 0.82, 95% CI [0.75, 0.85], adj. R2 = 0.79). Within this
48+
model:
49+
50+
- The effect of b Intercept (Median = 19.23, 95% CI [6.80, 31.02]) has a 99.67%
51+
probability of being positive (> 0), 99.67% of being significant (> 0.30), and
52+
99.33% of being large (> 1.81). The estimation successfully converged (Rhat =
53+
0.999) but the indices are unreliable (ESS = 343)
54+
- The effect of b qsec (Median = 0.95, 95% CI [0.41, 1.56]) has a 100.00%
55+
probability of being positive (> 0), 99.17% of being significant (> 0.30), and
56+
0.33% of being large (> 1.81). The estimation successfully converged (Rhat =
57+
0.999) but the indices are unreliable (ESS = 345)
58+
- The effect of b wt (Median = -5.02, 95% CI [-6.06, -4.09]) has a 100.00%
59+
probability of being negative (< 0), 100.00% of being significant (< -0.30),
60+
and 100.00% of being large (< -1.81). The estimation successfully converged
61+
(Rhat = 0.999) but the indices are unreliable (ESS = 586)
62+
63+
Following the Sequential Effect eXistence and sIgnificance Testing (SEXIT)
64+
framework, we report the median of the posterior distribution and its 95% CI
65+
(Highest Density Interval), along the probability of direction (pd), the
66+
probability of significance and the probability of being large. The thresholds
67+
beyond which the effect is considered as significant (i.e., non-negligible) and
68+
large are |0.30| and |1.81| (corresponding respectively to 0.05 and 0.30 of the
69+
outcome's SD). Convergence and stability of the Bayesian sampling has been
70+
assessed using R-hat, which should be below 1.01 (Vehtari et al., 2019), and
71+
Effective Sample Size (ESS), which should be greater than 1000 (Burkner,
72+
2017)., We fitted a Bayesian linear model (estimated using MCMC sampling with 4
73+
chains of 300 iterations and a warmup of 150) to predict mpg with qsec and wt
74+
(formula: mpg ~ qsec + wt). Priors over parameters were set as uniform
75+
(location = , scale = ) distributions. The model's explanatory power is
76+
substantial (R2 = 0.82, 95% CI [0.75, 0.85], adj. R2 = 0.79). Within this
77+
model:
78+
79+
- The effect of b Intercept (Median = 19.23, 95% CI [6.80, 31.02]) has a 99.67%
80+
probability of being positive (> 0), 99.67% of being significant (> 0.30), and
81+
99.33% of being large (> 1.81). The estimation successfully converged (Rhat =
82+
0.999) but the indices are unreliable (ESS = 343)
83+
- The effect of b qsec (Median = 0.95, 95% CI [0.41, 1.56]) has a 100.00%
84+
probability of being positive (> 0), 99.17% of being significant (> 0.30), and
85+
0.33% of being large (> 1.81). The estimation successfully converged (Rhat =
86+
0.999) but the indices are unreliable (ESS = 345)
87+
- The effect of b wt (Median = -5.02, 95% CI [-6.06, -4.09]) has a 100.00%
88+
probability of being negative (< 0), 100.00% of being significant (< -0.30),
89+
and 100.00% of being large (< -1.81). The estimation successfully converged
90+
(Rhat = 0.999) but the indices are unreliable (ESS = 586)
91+
92+
Following the Sequential Effect eXistence and sIgnificance Testing (SEXIT)
93+
framework, we report the median of the posterior distribution and its 95% CI
94+
(Highest Density Interval), along the probability of direction (pd), the
95+
probability of significance and the probability of being large. The thresholds
96+
beyond which the effect is considered as significant (i.e., non-negligible) and
97+
large are |0.30| and |1.81| (corresponding respectively to 0.05 and 0.30 of the
98+
outcome's SD). Convergence and stability of the Bayesian sampling has been
99+
assessed using R-hat, which should be below 1.01 (Vehtari et al., 2019), and
100+
Effective Sample Size (ESS), which should be greater than 1000 (Burkner,
101+
2017)., We fitted a Bayesian linear model (estimated using MCMC sampling with 4
102+
chains of 300 iterations and a warmup of 150) to predict mpg with qsec and wt
103+
(formula: mpg ~ qsec + wt). Priors over parameters were set as uniform
104+
(location = , scale = ) distributions. The model's explanatory power is
105+
substantial (R2 = 0.82, 95% CI [0.75, 0.85], adj. R2 = 0.79). Within this
106+
model:
107+
108+
- The effect of b Intercept (Median = 19.23, 95% CI [6.80, 31.02]) has a 99.67%
109+
probability of being positive (> 0), 99.67% of being significant (> 0.30), and
110+
99.33% of being large (> 1.81). The estimation successfully converged (Rhat =
111+
0.999) but the indices are unreliable (ESS = 343)
112+
- The effect of b qsec (Median = 0.95, 95% CI [0.41, 1.56]) has a 100.00%
113+
probability of being positive (> 0), 99.17% of being significant (> 0.30), and
114+
0.33% of being large (> 1.81). The estimation successfully converged (Rhat =
115+
0.999) but the indices are unreliable (ESS = 345)
116+
- The effect of b wt (Median = -5.02, 95% CI [-6.06, -4.09]) has a 100.00%
117+
probability of being negative (< 0), 100.00% of being significant (< -0.30),
118+
and 100.00% of being large (< -1.81). The estimation successfully converged
119+
(Rhat = 0.999) but the indices are unreliable (ESS = 586)
120+
121+
Following the Sequential Effect eXistence and sIgnificance Testing (SEXIT)
122+
framework, we report the median of the posterior distribution and its 95% CI
123+
(Highest Density Interval), along the probability of direction (pd), the
124+
probability of significance and the probability of being large. The thresholds
125+
beyond which the effect is considered as significant (i.e., non-negligible) and
126+
large are |0.30| and |1.81| (corresponding respectively to 0.05 and 0.30 of the
127+
outcome's SD). Convergence and stability of the Bayesian sampling has been
128+
assessed using R-hat, which should be below 1.01 (Vehtari et al., 2019), and
129+
Effective Sample Size (ESS), which should be greater than 1000 (Burkner, 2017).
130+
and We fitted a Bayesian linear model (estimated using MCMC sampling with 4
131+
chains of 300 iterations and a warmup of 150) to predict mpg with qsec and wt
132+
(formula: mpg ~ qsec + wt). Priors over parameters were set as student_t
133+
(location = 0.00, scale = 5.40) distributions. The model's explanatory power is
134+
substantial (R2 = 0.82, 95% CI [0.75, 0.85], adj. R2 = 0.79). Within this
135+
model:
136+
137+
- The effect of b Intercept (Median = 19.23, 95% CI [6.80, 31.02]) has a 99.67%
138+
probability of being positive (> 0), 99.67% of being significant (> 0.30), and
139+
99.33% of being large (> 1.81). The estimation successfully converged (Rhat =
140+
0.999) but the indices are unreliable (ESS = 343)
141+
- The effect of b qsec (Median = 0.95, 95% CI [0.41, 1.56]) has a 100.00%
142+
probability of being positive (> 0), 99.17% of being significant (> 0.30), and
143+
0.33% of being large (> 1.81). The estimation successfully converged (Rhat =
144+
0.999) but the indices are unreliable (ESS = 345)
145+
- The effect of b wt (Median = -5.02, 95% CI [-6.06, -4.09]) has a 100.00%
146+
probability of being negative (< 0), 100.00% of being significant (< -0.30),
147+
and 100.00% of being large (< -1.81). The estimation successfully converged
148+
(Rhat = 0.999) but the indices are unreliable (ESS = 586)
149+
150+
Following the Sequential Effect eXistence and sIgnificance Testing (SEXIT)
151+
framework, we report the median of the posterior distribution and its 95% CI
152+
(Highest Density Interval), along the probability of direction (pd), the
153+
probability of significance and the probability of being large. The thresholds
154+
beyond which the effect is considered as significant (i.e., non-negligible) and
155+
large are |0.30| and |1.81| (corresponding respectively to 0.05 and 0.30 of the
156+
outcome's SD). Convergence and stability of the Bayesian sampling has been
157+
assessed using R-hat, which should be below 1.01 (Vehtari et al., 2019), and
158+
Effective Sample Size (ESS), which should be greater than 1000 (Burkner, 2017).
159+

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)