We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In our Anonymous Public Twitter Poll: https://twitter.com/nelsonic/status/795164336834617344 There was an almost perfect Pareto distribution which I totally did not expect:
The beauty of using a Twitter Poll is that it's:
The downside of using the Twitter Poll is that:
elm-lang
And
I did not expect the result to be this positive (in favour of). I'm excited about the future again! (even if half of Americans aren't!!)
result
this
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Poll closed a while back. Results were positive. Outcome was: https://github.com/dwyl/learn-elm-architecture-in-javascript and https://github.com/dwyl/learn-elm closing issue. ✅
while
Sorry, something went wrong.
Just clicked the link to view the poll and noticed a discrepancy when I viewed the "stats": [Click on the Image to Enlarge]
The votes is 49 on the poll results but 44 in Tweet Activity ... Found a Bug in Twitter Polls... Either way it's the distribution I'm interested in. 👍
No branches or pull requests
In our Anonymous Public Twitter Poll: https://twitter.com/nelsonic/status/795164336834617344
There was an almost perfect Pareto distribution which I totally did not expect:
The beauty of using a Twitter Poll is that it's:
The downside of using the Twitter Poll is that:
elm-lang
areAnd
given the final result they are unlikely to speak up... 😞I did not expect the
result
to bethis
positive (in favour of).I'm excited about the future again! (even if half of Americans aren't!!)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: