Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

CHECK: expected string not found in input #88622

Closed
AndyAyersMS opened this issue Jul 10, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #88692
Closed

CHECK: expected string not found in input #88622

AndyAyersMS opened this issue Jul 10, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #88692
Assignees
@TIHan
Labels
area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI blocking-outerloop Blocking the 'runtime-coreclr outerloop' and 'runtime-libraries-coreclr outerloop' runs Priority:1 Work that is critical for the release, but we could probably ship without
Milestone
8.0.0

Comments

@AndyAyersMS
Copy link
Member

https://dev.azure.com/dnceng-public/public/_build/results?buildId=333311&view=ms.vss-test-web.build-test-results-tab

Numerous failures like the following:

07:38:01.038 Running test: JIT/opt/Add/IntAdd/IntAdd.cmd
__tmp0_IntAdd.cs:12:11: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input
// CHECK: Lcl frame size =
          ^
__jit_disasm.out:1:86: note: scanning from here
; Assembly listing for method CodeGenTests.IntAdd:Int8_Add(byte,byte):byte (FullOpts)
                                                                                     ^
__jit_disasm.out:5:9: note: possible intended match here
; rsp based frame
        ^

Input file: __jit_disasm.out
Check file: __tmp0_IntAdd.cs

-dump-input=help explains the following input dump.

Input was:
<<<<<<
            1: ; Assembly listing for method CodeGenTests.IntAdd:Int8_Add(byte,byte):byte (FullOpts) 
check:12'0                                                                                          X error: no match found
            2: ; Emitting BLENDED_CODE for X64 with AVX512 - Windows 
check:12'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            3: ; FullOpts code 
check:12'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            4: ; optimized code 
check:12'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            5: ; rsp based frame 
check:12'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
check:12'1             ?          possible intended match
            6: ; partially interruptible 
check:12'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            7: ; No PGO data 
check:12'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            8:  
check:12'0     ~
            9: G_M000_IG01: ;; offset=0000H 
check:12'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
@AndyAyersMS AndyAyersMS added area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI blocking-outerloop Blocking the 'runtime-coreclr outerloop' and 'runtime-libraries-coreclr outerloop' runs labels Jul 10, 2023
@ghost ghost added the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Jul 10, 2023
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 10, 2023

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

https://dev.azure.com/dnceng-public/public/_build/results?buildId=333311&view=ms.vss-test-web.build-test-results-tab

Numerous failures like the following:

07:38:01.038 Running test: JIT/opt/Add/IntAdd/IntAdd.cmd
__tmp0_IntAdd.cs:12:11: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input
// CHECK: Lcl frame size =
          ^
__jit_disasm.out:1:86: note: scanning from here
; Assembly listing for method CodeGenTests.IntAdd:Int8_Add(byte,byte):byte (FullOpts)
                                                                                     ^
__jit_disasm.out:5:9: note: possible intended match here
; rsp based frame
        ^

Input file: __jit_disasm.out
Check file: __tmp0_IntAdd.cs

-dump-input=help explains the following input dump.

Input was:
<<<<<<
            1: ; Assembly listing for method CodeGenTests.IntAdd:Int8_Add(byte,byte):byte (FullOpts) 
check:12'0                                                                                          X error: no match found
            2: ; Emitting BLENDED_CODE for X64 with AVX512 - Windows 
check:12'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            3: ; FullOpts code 
check:12'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            4: ; optimized code 
check:12'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            5: ; rsp based frame 
check:12'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
check:12'1             ?          possible intended match
            6: ; partially interruptible 
check:12'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            7: ; No PGO data 
check:12'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            8:  
check:12'0     ~
            9: G_M000_IG01: ;; offset=0000H 
check:12'0     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Author: AndyAyersMS
Assignees: -
Labels:

area-CodeGen-coreclr, blocking-outerloop
Milestone: -

@JulieLeeMSFT JulieLeeMSFT added the Priority:1 Work that is critical for the release, but we could probably ship without label Jul 11, 2023
@JulieLeeMSFT JulieLeeMSFT added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Jul 11, 2023
@ghost ghost removed the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Jul 11, 2023
@TIHan TIHan self-assigned this Jul 11, 2023
@TIHan TIHan mentioned this issue Jul 11, 2023
Merged
@ghost ghost added the in-pr There is an active PR which will close this issue when it is merged label Jul 11, 2023
@ghost ghost removed the in-pr There is an active PR which will close this issue when it is merged label Jul 12, 2023
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 13, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@TIHan TIHan

Labels
area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI blocking-outerloop Blocking the 'runtime-coreclr outerloop' and 'runtime-libraries-coreclr outerloop' runs Priority:1 Work that is critical for the release, but we could probably ship without
Projects
None yet
Milestone
8.0.0
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Fix SuperFileCheck from failing outerloop TIHan/runtime
3 participants
@TIHan @AndyAyersMS @JulieLeeMSFT